<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/137107/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>UK debates outsourcing EHR to Google or Microsoft</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/09/uk-debates-outsourcing-ehr-google-or-microsoft</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Two major opposition political parties in the United Kingdom are in a debate over how to maintain electronic health records, according to a report in &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/06/cameron-health-google-microsoft&quot; id=&quot;hu75&quot; title=&quot;The Guardian&quot;&gt;The Guardian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Conservative Tories would like to encourage patients to use services such as Google Health and Microsoft HealthVault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another party, the Liberal Democrats, support a $19 billion dollar government plan to build a national patient record database. The plan has been in the works since 2005.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With Google or Microsoft, &amp;quot;people can store their health records securely online; they can show them to whichever doctor they want,&amp;quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/06/cameron-health-google-microsoft&quot; id=&quot;a-8e&quot; title=&quot;David Cameron, the current Tory leader said&quot;&gt;David Cameron, the current Tory leader said&lt;/a&gt; at a recent conference. &amp;quot;They&#039;re in control, not the state.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   However, Barry Murphy, head of technology at PricewaterhouseCoopers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworlduk.com/management/government-law/public-sector/news/index.cfm?newsid=15555&quot; id=&quot;l_ea&quot; title=&quot;told ComputerWorld UK&quot;&gt;told ComputerWorld UK&lt;/a&gt; that although using Google or Microsoft could save money, it could also lead to complications. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   &amp;quot;It would...need to be accompanied by an explicit and implicit trust that the data would not be misused, abused or lost,&amp;quot; he said. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The UK&#039;s National Health Service has been planning an electronic database for patient records since 1998, according to a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rwjf.org/pr/product.jsp?id=31831&quot; id=&quot;zt4l&quot; title=&quot;study sponsored by the Robert Wood Foundation&quot;&gt;study sponsored by the Robert Wood Foundation&lt;/a&gt;. The database is expected to see completion in 2014, four years behind schedule. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;   The Wood Foundation study reported that while there is strong support for EHR throughout the UK, differing viewpoints on how to best implement a nationwide system has resulted in slow progress.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/09/uk-debates-outsourcing-ehr-google-or-microsoft#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/835">co:microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/14012">product:Google Health</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/15768">product:HealthVault</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5704">UK</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 11:26:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Sindya Bhanoo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">137107 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
