<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/136803/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Bing Builds an Underwhelming Twitter Search</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/02/bing-builds-underwhelming-twitter-search</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/167744/bing_gaining_on_google_not_necessarily.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a competitive edge&lt;/a&gt; in the Internet search wars, Microsoft plans to index Twitter updates in real time for Bing, its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/165667/microsoft_picks_bing_as_name_for_new_search_engine.html?tk=rel_news&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently rebranded search engine&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The idea is that recent developments on the social messaging service will be easy to find (fitting with Microsoft&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/166067/microsofts_bing_ad_claims_to_terminate_search_overload.html?tk=rel_news&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bing advertising mantra&lt;/a&gt; that it reduces search overload), with the search engine displaying snippets of status updates front-and-center in its results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before you go hunting for your latest recounting of breakfast, though, understand that for now, Microsoft is only integrating tweets from &quot;some of the more prominent and prolific Twitterers from a variety of spheres,&quot; Sean Suchter, general manager of Microsoft&#039;s Silicon Valley Search Technology Center, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bing.com/community/blogs/search/archive/2009/07/01/bringing-a-bit-of-twitter-to-bing.aspx&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;said in a blog post&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After trying some searches for these celebrity Twitterers, I&#039;m underwhelmed. Sure, the function works as advertised: Type &quot;Kara Swisher&quot; into the text form, and the top result is a link to her Twitter feed and a few of her latest tweets. Why that&#039;s advantageous over visiting Swisher&#039;s actual page on Twitter, I&#039;m not sure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To make matters worse, this functionality falls apart when searching for the very things the Twitter VIPs are writing about. For example, I searched for &quot;Kara Swisher Vision Quest,&quot; as the latter two words appear in one of her recent tweets. After getting nothing on the first three pages of Bing results, I gave up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By comparison, Google listed a relevant tweet in eighth place on its front page. In fact, Google does a pretty good job of indexing Twitter searches from all users, famous or obscure. A topic I wrote about yesterday on Twitter appeared on top of my search results, and thanks to Google&#039;s &quot;more results from twitter.com&quot; link, finding related tweets was a breeze.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fairness, there&#039;s room for both engines to improve. Google&#039;s good at indexing tweets, but not working up to the minute and sorting results for the user (chronological order would be a great fit). Bing seems to have those functions in store, but it fails at delivering targeted search results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any chance we can get the two companies to combine their efforts? I didn&#039;t think so.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/02/bing-builds-underwhelming-twitter-search#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1531">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1545">Search engines</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2611">Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:10:12 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">136803 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
