<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/133918/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The iPhone&#039;s AT&amp;T exclusivity extended to 2011?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s exclusive deal to be the carrier for the iPhone in the United States has been a boon to the company. In the second half of 2008, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T gained more than four million new iPhone subscribers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the exclusive deal is reported to end in 2010, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;according to &amp;quot;people familiar with the matter&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; If AT&amp;amp;T wants to keep its grip on the next-generation versions of this revolutionary device, it needs to convince Apple to extend the exclusivity arrangement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s going to be tough -- Apple wants to get its products in the hands of more people, and many customers are too loyal to another carrier, unable to get good AT&amp;amp;T coverage, or wary of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s reputation. There has been a lot of interest in our prediction about a &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/iphone-verizon-announced-june-30-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Verizon iPhone&lt;/a&gt; being announced by the end of June 2009, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an earlier prediction around MacWorld 2009&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, AT&amp;amp;T has shown it will go out of its way to work with Apple&#039;s demands on the iPhone. The latest rumor: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestreet.com/story/10497522/1/tech-rumor-of-the-day-apple.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T will drop the monthly service plan price by $10&lt;/a&gt; when a new iPhone model is reportedly released next month. Another potential reason for Apple to agree to extend its exclusivity deal with AT&amp;amp;T is the cost associated with developing and rolling out an iPhone that works on other carriers&#039; networks (see discussion &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2009/03/05/verizon-iphone-coming-2009-doubt-it#comment-10795&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009#comment-8558&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple would also have an incentive to announce such an extension soon rather than later: Too many potential customers are waiting on the sidelines, hoping that Apple will open up to other carriers such as Verizon. By making it clear that AT&amp;amp;T is the exclusive iPhone partner for longer, there will be a strong incentive for the holdouts to come in from the cold.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;PREDICTION: &lt;/b&gt;Reports say that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/163151/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is in talks with Apple to extend its exclusivity agreement for iPhone from 2010 to 2011&lt;/a&gt;. The key criteria for this prediction is that a formal announcement by AT&amp;amp;T and/or Apple will be made that states AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s iPhone exclusivity has been extended to some point in the year 2011. For favorable judgment, the announcement must be made by the end of August 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that an announcement of an expiry date in 2011 will not count as a favorable criteria unless it is made clear that this date is an extension of the original expiry date of the exclusivity arrangement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/859">co:AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5755">product:iphone</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:35:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">133918 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The iPhone&#039;s AT&amp;T exclusivity extended to 2011?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s exclusive deal to be the carrier for the iPhone in the United States has been a boon to the company. In the second half of 2008, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T gained more than four million new iPhone subscribers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the exclusive deal is reported to end in 2010, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;according to &amp;quot;people familiar with the matter&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; If AT&amp;amp;T wants to keep its grip on the next-generation versions of this revolutionary device, it needs to convince Apple to extend the exclusivity arrangement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s going to be tough -- Apple wants to get its products in the hands of more people, and many customers are too loyal to another carrier, unable to get good AT&amp;amp;T coverage, or wary of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s reputation. There has been a lot of interest in our prediction about a &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/iphone-verizon-announced-june-30-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Verizon iPhone&lt;/a&gt; being announced by the end of June 2009, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an earlier prediction around MacWorld 2009&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, AT&amp;amp;T has shown it will go out of its way to work with Apple&#039;s demands on the iPhone. The latest rumor: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestreet.com/story/10497522/1/tech-rumor-of-the-day-apple.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T will drop the monthly service plan price by $10&lt;/a&gt; when a new iPhone model is reportedly released next month. Another potential reason for Apple to agree to extend its exclusivity deal with AT&amp;amp;T is the cost associated with developing and rolling out an iPhone that works on other carriers&#039; networks (see discussion &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2009/03/05/verizon-iphone-coming-2009-doubt-it#comment-10795&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009#comment-8558&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple would also have an incentive to announce such an extension soon rather than later: Too many potential customers are waiting on the sidelines, hoping that Apple will open up to other carriers such as Verizon. By making it clear that AT&amp;amp;T is the exclusive iPhone partner for longer, there will be a strong incentive for the holdouts to come in from the cold.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;PREDICTION: &lt;/b&gt;Reports say that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/163151/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is in talks with Apple to extend its exclusivity agreement for iPhone from 2010 to 2011&lt;/a&gt;. The key criteria for this prediction is that a formal announcement by AT&amp;amp;T and/or Apple will be made that states AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s iPhone exclusivity has been extended to some point in the year 2011. For favorable judgment, the announcement must be made by the end of August 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that an announcement of an expiry date in 2011 will not count as a favorable criteria unless it is made clear that this date is an extension of the original expiry date of the exclusivity arrangement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/859">co:AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5755">product:iphone</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:35:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">133918 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The iPhone&#039;s AT&amp;T exclusivity extended to 2011?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s exclusive deal to be the carrier for the iPhone in the United States has been a boon to the company. In the second half of 2008, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T gained more than four million new iPhone subscribers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the exclusive deal is reported to end in 2010, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;according to &amp;quot;people familiar with the matter&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; If AT&amp;amp;T wants to keep its grip on the next-generation versions of this revolutionary device, it needs to convince Apple to extend the exclusivity arrangement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s going to be tough -- Apple wants to get its products in the hands of more people, and many customers are too loyal to another carrier, unable to get good AT&amp;amp;T coverage, or wary of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s reputation. There has been a lot of interest in our prediction about a &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/iphone-verizon-announced-june-30-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Verizon iPhone&lt;/a&gt; being announced by the end of June 2009, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an earlier prediction around MacWorld 2009&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, AT&amp;amp;T has shown it will go out of its way to work with Apple&#039;s demands on the iPhone. The latest rumor: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestreet.com/story/10497522/1/tech-rumor-of-the-day-apple.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T will drop the monthly service plan price by $10&lt;/a&gt; when a new iPhone model is reportedly released next month. Another potential reason for Apple to agree to extend its exclusivity deal with AT&amp;amp;T is the cost associated with developing and rolling out an iPhone that works on other carriers&#039; networks (see discussion &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2009/03/05/verizon-iphone-coming-2009-doubt-it#comment-10795&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009#comment-8558&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple would also have an incentive to announce such an extension soon rather than later: Too many potential customers are waiting on the sidelines, hoping that Apple will open up to other carriers such as Verizon. By making it clear that AT&amp;amp;T is the exclusive iPhone partner for longer, there will be a strong incentive for the holdouts to come in from the cold.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;PREDICTION: &lt;/b&gt;Reports say that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/163151/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is in talks with Apple to extend its exclusivity agreement for iPhone from 2010 to 2011&lt;/a&gt;. The key criteria for this prediction is that a formal announcement by AT&amp;amp;T and/or Apple will be made that states AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s iPhone exclusivity has been extended to some point in the year 2011. For favorable judgment, the announcement must be made by the end of August 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that an announcement of an expiry date in 2011 will not count as a favorable criteria unless it is made clear that this date is an extension of the original expiry date of the exclusivity arrangement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/859">co:AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5755">product:iphone</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:35:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">133918 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The iPhone&#039;s AT&amp;T exclusivity extended to 2011?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s exclusive deal to be the carrier for the iPhone in the United States has been a boon to the company. In the second half of 2008, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T gained more than four million new iPhone subscribers&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the exclusive deal is reported to end in 2010, &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123973238611017715.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;according to &amp;quot;people familiar with the matter&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; If AT&amp;amp;T wants to keep its grip on the next-generation versions of this revolutionary device, it needs to convince Apple to extend the exclusivity arrangement. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s going to be tough -- Apple wants to get its products in the hands of more people, and many customers are too loyal to another carrier, unable to get good AT&amp;amp;T coverage, or wary of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s reputation. There has been a lot of interest in our prediction about a &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/iphone-verizon-announced-june-30-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Verizon iPhone&lt;/a&gt; being announced by the end of June 2009, as well as &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;an earlier prediction around MacWorld 2009&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other hand, AT&amp;amp;T has shown it will go out of its way to work with Apple&#039;s demands on the iPhone. The latest rumor: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestreet.com/story/10497522/1/tech-rumor-of-the-day-apple.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T will drop the monthly service plan price by $10&lt;/a&gt; when a new iPhone model is reportedly released next month. Another potential reason for Apple to agree to extend its exclusivity deal with AT&amp;amp;T is the cost associated with developing and rolling out an iPhone that works on other carriers&#039; networks (see discussion &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2009/03/05/verizon-iphone-coming-2009-doubt-it#comment-10795&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/verizon-iphone-announced-macworld-2009#comment-8558&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple would also have an incentive to announce such an extension soon rather than later: Too many potential customers are waiting on the sidelines, hoping that Apple will open up to other carriers such as Verizon. By making it clear that AT&amp;amp;T is the exclusive iPhone partner for longer, there will be a strong incentive for the holdouts to come in from the cold.    &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;PREDICTION: &lt;/b&gt;Reports say that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/163151/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AT&amp;amp;T is in talks with Apple to extend its exclusivity agreement for iPhone from 2010 to 2011&lt;/a&gt;. The key criteria for this prediction is that a formal announcement by AT&amp;amp;T and/or Apple will be made that states AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s iPhone exclusivity has been extended to some point in the year 2011. For favorable judgment, the announcement must be made by the end of August 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that an announcement of an expiry date in 2011 will not count as a favorable criteria unless it is made clear that this date is an extension of the original expiry date of the exclusivity arrangement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphones-t-exclusivity-extended#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/859">co:AT&amp;amp;T</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5755">product:iphone</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:35:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">133918 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
