<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/131552/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Google/Twitter acquisition rumor goes down in flames</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/04/03/insiders-shoot-down-google-twitter-acquisition-rumor</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is Google about to buy Twitter? The rumor mill has been buzzing for some time, but was given new fuel last night after a late-night TechCrunch report &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/04/02/sources-google-in-late-stage-talks-to-buy-twitter/&quot;&gt;said&lt;/a&gt; two separate sources allegedly claimed Google was in &amp;quot;late stage negotiations&amp;quot; to acquire Twitter. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t believe it, for one simple reason: AllThingsD reporter Kara Swisher, legally married in San Francisco to Google exec Megan Smith, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://kara.allthingsd.com/20090403/sorry-to-get-you-all-a-twitter-but-google-is-not-in-late-stage-talks-to-acquire-the-hot-microblogging-service/&quot;&gt;jumping up and down&lt;/a&gt; to deny the story.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why should I believe Swisher more than anyone else? Simple: Swisher, a notorious gossipmonger (that&#039;s a compliment) prides herself on being right and being first. If Google really does buy Twitter, she&#039;ll look like either an idiot or a stooge for her wife&#039;s company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;i&gt;Financial Times&lt;/i&gt; has an &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.ft.com/techblog/2009/04/google-is-eyeing-not-buying-twitter/&quot;&gt;outsidery analysis&lt;/a&gt; of why the acquisiton doesn&#039;t make sense. Reporter Chris Nutall cites a source close to Twitter who called the rumor &amp;quot;fiction,&amp;quot; probably an overblown presumption based on meetings between the two companies to talk about working together. In tech, those meetings happen all the time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But I&#039;m banking on Swisher&#039;s smackdown. It Google really were close to buying Twitter, she&#039;d be the first to know.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/04/03/insiders-shoot-down-google-twitter-acquisition-rumor#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/778">co:google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/943">co:Twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:05:59 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Paul Boutin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">131552 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
