<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/127727/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Amazon limits Kindle 2&#039;s text-to-speech feature to make copyright holders happy</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/03/02/amazon-limits-kindle-2s-text-speech-feature-make-copyright-holders-happy</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When it comes to the new &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/02/09/public-reacts-kindle-2-announcement-too-expensive&quot;&gt;Kindle  2&lt;/a&gt;, publishers will decide whether or not you will be able to use the new text-to-speech feature on their books. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt; has decided to allow  copyright owners to opt out of the feature, but may not be telling everyone the real reason why they&#039;re  limiting one of the new reader&#039;s most attractive features. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Kindle 2&#039;s experimental text-to-speech feature is legal&amp;quot; asserts Amazon at  the start of &lt;a href=&quot;http://phx.corporate-ir.net/phoenix.zhtml?c=176060&amp;amp;p=irol-newsArticle&amp;amp;ID=1261092&amp;amp;highlight&quot;&gt;a  Friday announcement&lt;/a&gt;. Despite this claim, the company is clearly concerned about how the publishing industry views the feature and the potential copyright implications, and is willing to cede some control. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We strongly believe many rights holders will  be more comfortable with the text-to-speech feature if they are in the driver&#039;s  seat,&amp;quot; the document reads. &amp;quot;We have already begun to work on the technical changes required to give  authors and publishers that choice.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could a publisher successfully sue a company for selling a machine that reads  written text out loud? Most likely no. But publishers and authors don&#039;t need to go to court  to threaten Amazon, which needs their cooperation to make Kindle a success. And  those publishers and authors have their own audiobooks to sell -- often through  Amazon. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If Amazon has been threatened, the company isn&#039;t saying so. &amp;quot;It&#039;s our  practice not to comment on any discussions with other parties,&amp;quot; Director of  Communications Drew Herdener told the&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot; class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot;&gt; Industry Standard&lt;/span&gt; in an email exchange. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And if there are no threats, why the change? &amp;quot;We just believe rights holders  will be more comfortable with the text-to-speech feature if they are in the  driver&#039;s seat,&amp;quot; Herdener explained. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Image:&lt;/i&gt; Kindle 2, &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/&quot;&gt;Amazon.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/03/02/amazon-limits-kindle-2s-text-speech-feature-make-copyright-holders-happy#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5098">co:Amazon.com</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5800">product:Kindle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5668">Standards &amp;amp; Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 03:44:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lincoln Spector</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">127727 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
