<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/124219/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IBM sets new patent record in 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/01/13/ibm-sets-new-patent-record-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/intel.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-102680&quot; title=&quot;intel&quot; src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/intel.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;187&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibm.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IBM&lt;/a&gt; just announced that it is the first company ever to earn more than 4,000 U.S. patents in a single year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;VentureBeat writer Dean Takahashi has already written about some of the cool technology being developed at IBM&amp;#8217;s Almaden Research Center in San Jose, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2009/01/12/ibm-demos-a-microscope-with-100-million-times-the-resolution-of-conventional-mri/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a microscope with 100 times the resolution of magnetic resonance imaging&lt;/a&gt; and&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/19/ibm-aims-to-to-replicate-the-brain-via-darpa-project-on-cognitive-computing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; a computer modeled on the human brain&lt;/a&gt;, but IBM&amp;#8217;s announcement puts a number on all of that innovation: 4,186, the amount of patents IBM earned in 2008. That&amp;#8217;s more than Microsoft, Hewlett-Packard, Oracle, Apple, EMC, Accenture, and Google combined.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#8217;s pretty mind-boggling, especially since we&amp;#8217;re talking about patents earned, not just applied for. (Virtually every startup I interview has some kind of &amp;#8220;patent pending.&amp;#8221;) Of course, just because an idea was patented doesn&amp;#8217;t mean it will pay off &amp;#8212; quality trumps quantity. Apparently, this is the 16th consecutive record IBM has made for most patents earned, but it doesn&amp;#8217;t generate the excitement in the tech world that you see around &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Apple&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&amp;#8217;s a sampling of patents that IBM included in its announcement:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Wireless system to detect presence of child in a baby seat.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Ultralow dialetric constant layer with controlled biaxial stress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Method of using RFID systems to help blind and visually impaired individuals.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Methods and structures for promoting stable synthesis of carbon nanotubes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. CMOS imager with copper wiring and method of eliminating high reflectivity interfaces.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/01/13/ibm-sets-new-patent-record-2008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/702">Business and Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1088">co:IBM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:25:10 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Venture Beat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">124219 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
