<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/121741/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Will USB 3.0 kill short-range wireless development?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/11/17/will-usb-3-0-kill-short-range-wireless-development</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Industry publications are agog at &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usb.org/press/USB-IF_Press_Releases/2008_11_17_USB_IF.pdf&quot;&gt;today&#039;s press release announcing&lt;/a&gt; the availability of the USB 3.0 specification and the exciting prospect of fastest USB spec yet. And once again, the red-headed stepchild of USB, FireWire, appears to be getting passed over for a newer, faster technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2008/11/superspeed-us-1.html&quot;&gt;Wired notes&lt;/a&gt; that the new USB 3.0 spec will most likely kill FireWire, something Apple may have anticipated when it dropped the technology from its laptop line. It&#039;s also likely that wireless USB (WUSB) and Ultra-Wideband (UWB) may lag in development as well. UWB&#039;s speed, around 100 Mbps, can&#039;t compare to the promised 500 Mbps transfer rates of USB 3.0, making it useful for minor devices, but not fast enough for use in the latest high-tech peripherals.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MCCI was one of the first companies to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/MCCI-Partners-Synopsys-Accelerate-SuperSpeed/story.aspx?guid=%7B11C3557A-9C38-46C7-9CF2-AFA07166B6EC%7D&quot;&gt;announce planned development&lt;/a&gt; of USB 3.0 products, in partnership with Synopsis, estimating that initial products should hit the market in 2009, with additional products arriving in 2010. In &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS9162063125.html&quot;&gt;an interview with LinuxDevices&lt;/a&gt;, MCCI CEO Terry Moore notes that USB 3.0 will be focused more on the PC market, while UWB may be &amp;quot;suitable for a lot of mobile product applications.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/11/17/will-usb-3-0-kill-short-range-wireless-development#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/12025">co:MCCI</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/12026">people:Terry Moore</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5668">Standards &amp;amp; Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5632">USB 3.0</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/4999">UWB</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/12027">WUSB</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:29:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">121741 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
