<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/119787/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Starcraft II: Still no release date, but get ready to open your wallet</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/10/10/starcraft-ii-still-no-release-date-get-ready-open-your-wallet</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While long-suffering Starcraft fans are still waiting for a release date for Starcraft II, they at least got a teaser from Blizzard today. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/55267&quot;&gt;Shack News reports&lt;/a&gt; that Blizzard has announced that the game will actually be a &amp;quot;trilogy&amp;quot; with the game broken into three sections, or campaigns. The first to be released will be &lt;i&gt;Terrans: Wings of Liberty&lt;/i&gt;, and the following two (&lt;i&gt;Zerg: Heart of the Swarm&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Protoss: Legacy of the Void&lt;/i&gt;&amp;quot;) released as expansion packs. Blizzard maintains that the game has to be split:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;... to maintain the quality of the product, the alternatives either being a long delay of the game, or a scaling back of the campaigns.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Blizzard claims that the multi-player functionality promised won&#039;t be compromised by the split, the company did acknowledge that some game units won&#039;t be available as multi-player units.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Blizzard is undoubtedly hoping for &lt;i&gt;The Sims&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;World of Warcraft&lt;/i&gt; piles of money by moving to an expansion pack model for the game, it may be a misstep for the release. It will undoubtedly be a big seller for Blizzard, but expecting fans to pay three times for a game that&#039;s partially hobbled for multi-player gaming may be asking too much.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/10/10/starcraft-ii-still-no-release-date-get-ready-open-your-wallet#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/4798">co:Blizzard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5663">Lifestyle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/11396">product:Starcraft II</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2948">video games</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 17:40:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">119787 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
