<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/112563/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Why China Mobile isn&#039;t right for Apple and the iPhone</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/04/why-china-mobile-isnt-right-apple-and-iphone</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple&#039;s discussions with China Mobile about bringing the popular handset to the  world&#039;s largest mobile market is the stuff of tech journalists&#039; dreams. The  potential deal would join together the world&#039;s largest mobile service provider  with the planet&#039;s most talked-about phone. Both companies are tight-lipped,  offering us nothing more than confirmations of the talks and statements that  indicate that the two sides want to make a deal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With no deal, no  timetable and ultimately no pressure on either side to come to an agreement,  there&#039;s a lot of room in between for speculation. So here&#039;s my contribution:  Apple is negotiating with the wrong potential partner for the iPhone in  China.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The biggest issue for the two companies is China Mobile&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/news/feeds/08/07/22/China-Mobile-begins-3G-marketing-push.html&quot;&gt;choice&lt;/a&gt;  of homegrown TD-SCDMA (Time Division Synchronous Code Division Multiple Access)  as its 3G (third generation telephony) standard. That standard is incompatible  with the other two main 3G systems, WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple  Access) and CDMA2000. Therefore, in order to launch the 3G iPhone in China, it  would need to make either a TD-SCDMA handset, or one that can handle multiple 3G  standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That technical issue is aside from the corporate culture of  the two companies being totally different. Apple is an innovator, a marketing  machine and a category killer in portable music players. China Mobile is not a  category killer, but a category owner. Although it is not a monopoly player, it  might as well be. A shake-up of China&#039;s telecom sector is creating an additional  new competitor to China Mobile, but China Unicom, the only other current mobile  service provider, competes on price, not service. China Mobile does a  satisfactory job for its 400 million-plus customers but it doesn&#039;t need to try  harder.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;China Mobile has also rejected Apple&#039;s revenue-sharing demands.  As observer and consultant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconhutong.com/&quot;&gt;David Wolf&lt;/a&gt;  noted when the first round of talks broke off in January, &amp;quot;The parties walked  away from the table because they don&#039;t really need each other to succeed.&amp;quot; It  would be nice for Apple to sell the iPhone in China, but it doesn&#039;t need to do  so to be successful. China Mobile has lots of phones to sell. Even if you take  into account the estimated 800,000 smuggled iPhones now in use in China, that  accounts for less than 1 percent of all the handsets here. No iPhone to sell? No  tears from China Mobile.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, in China&#039;s telecom sector shuffle lies  what could be a very nice solution for Apple. Duncan Clark, chairman of Beijing  telecom consultancy and research firm &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bdaconnect.com/&quot;&gt;BDA  China&lt;/a&gt; said at the July 19 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macworld.com/article/134545/2008/07/applestorebeijing.html?lsrc=rss_main&quot;&gt;opening&lt;/a&gt;  of China&#039;s first Apple store that Apple&#039;s deal with AT&amp;amp;T Wireless was done  with &amp;quot;a weaker carrier,&amp;quot; which AT&amp;amp;T certainly is compared to China Mobile.  But why then wouldn&#039;t Apple want to go to a carrier in China that is similarly  weak and would therefore offer better terms?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;China is reorganzing its  telecom players into three major companies, all of which will offer both mobile  and fixed-line services: China Mobile, China Telecom and China  Unicom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;China Unicom begins life as a combined mobile and fixed-line  provider with about 130 million [m] mobile subscribers; China Telecom is doing  the same with zero mobile customers. Aside from desperation to compete with and  differentiate themselves from the world&#039;s number one and local incumbent, these  two companies are have an advantage that should be very attractive to Apple:  they will be using global 3G standards for their services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although China  Mobile&#039;s roll-out of TD-SCDMA will give that format a big boost, Unicom and  Telecom may be able to attract more globally-minded users -- those who will want  to take their 3G handsets and services with them when they go abroad for  business and pleasure. Unicom WCDMA trials are already underway, and Telecom  looks set to use CDMA2000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why would Apple deal with monolithic China  Mobile, when it could use global standard technology and probably extract  revenue-sharing terms from one of the more nimble new players? Although having  China Mobile as a partner might have some advantages for Apple, such as sheer  size and marketing might, it has generally chosen smaller operators in most of  the international markets it has entered. If that approach has worked elsewhere,  then why not in China also?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/zune-phone-announced-end-2008&quot;&gt;Zune Phone announced by end of 2008?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/psystar-mac-clone-maker-closes-down-end-year&quot;&gt;Psystar, Mac clone maker, closes down by end of year&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/google-chrome-mac-version-out-end-2008&quot;&gt;Google Chrome Mac version out by end of 2008?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/04/why-china-mobile-isnt-right-apple-and-iphone#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1812">china</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7795">co:China Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5755">product:iphone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 12:08:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112563 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
