<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/112477/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Net Views: Manipulating Digg for profit</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/03/net-views-manipulating-digg-profit</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;I would feel guilty if I was the only one but find me one Digg user from the entire community who doesn’t cheat the system, who doesn&#039;t ask for vote and then I will spill my guilt. But at this time I have no guilt whatsoever. I do what everybody else does. It is obvious that good content does not make it by itself on Digg.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;– &amp;quot;Anonymous,&amp;quot; The Invesp blog, &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.invesp.com/blog/social-media/an-interview-with-digg-top-user.html&quot;&gt;An interview with Digg top user&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Link: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techmeme.com/080903/p11#a080903p11&quot;&gt;Techmeme&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/03/net-views-manipulating-digg-profit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1186">co:Digg</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 07:23:34 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Net Views</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112477 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
