<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/112285/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Another massive funding for thin film solar, with $104M to AVA Solar, a challenger to First Solar</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/08/28/another-massive-funding-thin-film-solar-104m-ava-solar-challenger-first-solar</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ava1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-medium wp-image-97096&quot; title=&quot;ava1&quot; src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ava1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;240&quot; height=&quot;43&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;It may not be as much as the &lt;a id=&quot;gutt&quot; title=&quot;massive $300 million financing&quot; href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/08/27/nanosolar-outshines-the-competition-with-a-300m-financing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;colossal $300 million financing&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a id=&quot;5-&quot; title=&quot;Nanosolar&quot; href=&quot;http://nanosolar.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nanosolar&lt;/a&gt; finally disclosed yesterday &amp;#8212; the biggest ever for a solar company &amp;#8212; but another thin-film manufacturer, &lt;a id=&quot;yv&quot; title=&quot;AVA Solar&quot; href=&quot;http://www.avasolar.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;AVA Solar&lt;/a&gt;, has broken into the nine-figure funding range today, with a challenge to industry giant &lt;a id=&quot;ldar&quot; title=&quot;First Solar&amp;#039;s&quot; href=&quot;http://www.firstsolar.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;First Solar&amp;#8217;s&lt;/a&gt; dominance.&lt;br id=&quot;f1jn&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;f1jn0&quot; /&gt; AVA stands out a bit from its peers, for several reasons. For one, it&amp;#8217;s based in Fort Collins, Colorado, well away from the sunny or technology-laden areas its competitors operate in. The outfit has thus gotten relatively little attention. The second oddity is the technology that AVA uses, which builds thin-film cells using cadmium telluride (CdTe), a kind of semiconductor.&lt;br id=&quot;wspa&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;wspa0&quot; /&gt; Most of the biggest bets in thin-film solar, a form of solar panel that is less efficient than traditional silicon-based cells but much cheaper to make, are based on copper-indium-gallium-selenide, or CIGS technology. &lt;a id=&quot;s&quot; title=&quot;Ascent Solar&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ascentsolartech.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ascent Solar&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a id=&quot;la3j&quot; title=&quot;Heliovolt&quot; href=&quot;http://heliovolt.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Heliovolt&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a id=&quot;idgt&quot; title=&quot;Miasole&quot; href=&quot;http://miasole.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Miasole&lt;/a&gt;, Nanosolar, and a bunch of other companies all use CIGS. There&amp;#8217;s an ongoing debate as to whether CIGS, CdTe or a third material, thin-film silicon, is best.&lt;br id=&quot;fi7z&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;fi7z0&quot; /&gt; However, CdTe, despite a reputation for being difficult to work with, holds a singular distinction: It&amp;#8217;s what First Solar, the industry&amp;#8217;s first and only success, First Solar, uses. It has been reported  &lt;a id=&quot;xr8o&quot; title=&quot;that First Solar has no direct competitors&quot; href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9821209-54.html?tag=cd.blog&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;that First Solar has no direct competitors&lt;/a&gt; in CdTe technology. AVA obviously proves that claim wrong. A handful of others working with CdTe include &lt;a id=&quot;ch34&quot; title=&quot;Sunovia&quot; href=&quot;http://sunoviaenergy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Sunovia&lt;/a&gt; (OTCBB: SUNV), &lt;a id=&quot;a.2.&quot; title=&quot;Calyxo&quot; href=&quot;http://www.calyxo-solar.com/en/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Calyxo&lt;/a&gt;, which is owned by the German giant &lt;a id=&quot;de99&quot; title=&quot;Q-Cells&quot; href=&quot;http://www.q-cells.com/en/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Q-Cells&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a id=&quot;i-e0&quot; title=&quot;PrimeStar Solar&quot; href=&quot;http://www.primestarsolar.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;PrimeStar Solar&lt;/a&gt;, which recently &lt;a id=&quot;seg2&quot; title=&quot;sold a majority stake to General Electric Energy&quot; href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/06/13/thin-film-maker-primestar-solar-sells-majority-stake-to-ge-energy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;sold a majority stake to General Electric Energy&lt;/a&gt;. Primestar, like AVA, is based in Colorado.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AVA is currently building a plant in Fort Collins, CO, where it promises to employ 500 at a production line that will make 250 megawatts worth of cells a year by 2010. The company appears to use deposition on glass to make its cells, which is also what First Solar uses, although a company spokesman tells me that AVA&amp;#8217;s technique is &amp;#8220;completely different&amp;#8221;.&lt;br id=&quot;r9qy&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;o.jd4&quot; /&gt; A number of well-known venture firms came on for the $104 million funding. &lt;a class=&quot;fund&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dcmvc.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;DCM&lt;/a&gt; led, while new investors &lt;a class=&quot;fund&quot; href=&quot;http://www.technologypartners.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Technology Partners&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a class=&quot;fund&quot; href=&quot;https://www.glgpartners.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;GLG Partners&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bohemiancompanies.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bohemian Companies&lt;/a&gt; participated, and previous investor &lt;a class=&quot;fund&quot; href=&quot;http://www.invus.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Invus&lt;/a&gt; came back in. AVA raised its seed less than two years ago and took a second funding in June of 2007, but didn&amp;#8217;t disclose amounts for either of those fundings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ava2.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-97097&quot; title=&quot;ava2&quot; src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/ava2.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/08/28/another-massive-funding-thin-film-solar-104m-ava-solar-challenger-first-solar#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/702">Business and Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/791">CleanTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7616">co:ava solar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3985">co:first-solar</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/704">deal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7617">inv:bohemian companies</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1192">inv:DCM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3620">inv:glg-partners</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7618">inv:invus</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3229">inv:Technology-Partners</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:24:42 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Venture Beat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112285 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
