<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/111742/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Judge: Wikipedia is immune from defamation lawsuits</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/08/14/judge-wikipedia-immune-defamation-lawsuits-because-cda</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u2482/Nohat-logo-nowords-bgwhite-200px.jpg&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; /&gt;A New Jersey judge has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2008/08/wikipedia-wins-dismissal-baseless-defamation-claim&quot;&gt;dismissed a defamation lawsuit&lt;/a&gt; against Jimmy Wales&#039;s Wikimedia Foundation, owner of Wikipedia.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The case centered around statements made about literary agent Barbara Bauer which called her one of the &amp;quot;dumbest of the twenty worst&amp;quot; agents and claimed she had &amp;quot;no documented sales at all.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Electronic Freedom Foundation assisted with the defense of Wikimedia and successfully argued that Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act protected Wikimedia from liability of its users&#039; comments because it is an operator of an &amp;quot;interactive computer service.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s unclear why lawyers continue to file defamation lawsuits against big companies over user comments when they, nearly without fail, all get tossed out. Oh, wait, I know: they want the payday. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-ye%20ar-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2008/06/25/it-vs-initiative-internet-a%20ge-comes-battlefield&quot;&gt;IT vs. initiative: The Internet age comes to the battlefield&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/24/what-your-future-really%20-looks-digital-home-2013&quot;&gt;The Digital Home of 2013: 10 consumer technologies that will succeed, and five that will fail&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Whe re are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/08/14/judge-wikipedia-immune-defamation-lawsuits-because-cda#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/4539">co:Wikipedia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:01:10 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">111742 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
