<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/111044/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The CA cellphone termination fees judgement will be upheld in appeals</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/ca-cellphone-termination-fees-judgement-will-be-upheld-appeals</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;A California judge has ruled that early cellphone termination fees are illegal: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&quot; title=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In one of the most significant legal rulings in the tech industry this year, a Superior Court judge in California has ruled that the practice of charging consumers a fee for ending their cell phone contract early is illegal and violates state law.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that the judgment will be upheld on the first (inevitable) appeal takes place.  While there is not any way to know exactly when this appeal might take place, if this decision still stands as of October 1st, this will be judged in the affirmative.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/ca-cellphone-termination-fees-judgement-will-be-upheld-appeals#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/733">co:Sprint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1427">Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kevin Railsback</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">111044 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The CA cellphone termination fees judgement will be upheld in appeals</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/ca-cellphone-termination-fees-judgement-will-be-upheld-appeals</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;A California judge has ruled that early cellphone termination fees are illegal: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&quot; title=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In one of the most significant legal rulings in the tech industry this year, a Superior Court judge in California has ruled that the practice of charging consumers a fee for ending their cell phone contract early is illegal and violates state law.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that the judgment will be upheld on the first (inevitable) appeal takes place.  While there is not any way to know exactly when this appeal might take place, if this decision still stands as of October 1st, this will be judged in the affirmative.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/ca-cellphone-termination-fees-judgement-will-be-upheld-appeals#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/733">co:Sprint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1427">Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kevin Railsback</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">111044 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The CA cellphone termination fees judgement will be upheld in appeals</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/ca-cellphone-termination-fees-judgement-will-be-upheld-appeals</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;A California judge has ruled that early cellphone termination fees are illegal: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&quot; title=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.yahoo.com/s/926769&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;In one of the most significant legal rulings in the tech industry this year, a Superior Court judge in California has ruled that the practice of charging consumers a fee for ending their cell phone contract early is illegal and violates state law.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that the judgment will be upheld on the first (inevitable) appeal takes place.  While there is not any way to know exactly when this appeal might take place, if this decision still stands as of October 1st, this will be judged in the affirmative.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/ca-cellphone-termination-fees-judgement-will-be-upheld-appeals#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/733">co:Sprint</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1427">Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 18:38:27 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kevin Railsback</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">111044 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
