<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/110548/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Like Wikipedia but for Cash: Google&#039;s Knol</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/24/wikipedia-cash-googles-knol</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you&#039;re looking for a way to start writing for money, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/tags/Google+Inc..html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; as of Wednesday offers a new option.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Its new &lt;a href=&quot;http://knol.google.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Knol&lt;/a&gt; - short for &#039;a unit of knowledge&#039; - site is similar to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/tags/Wikimedia+Foundation+Inc..html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt; in that anyone can write an article on (almost) anything. But where Wikipedia is a collective endeavor where anyone can both write and edit pieces, Knol focuses on preserving ownership of articles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That ownership makes for two key differences when comparing Knol with Wikipedia. First, authors can choose &#039;Moderated collaboration&#039; for their work, which allows them to vet any proposed changes to their article. And second, authors can opt to show Google ads, and thereby share in their revenue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have a Gmail account, it takes about 30 seconds to start writing a knol. If you do, you can also choose open collaboration, where any signed-in user can edit the knol. And knols won&#039;t display revenue-generating ads by default. To get them, you&#039;ll need to create an AdSense account or tie in an existing account.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/07/knol-is-open-to-everyone.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&#039;s announcement post&lt;/a&gt; says that the company expects &quot;multiple knolls on the same subject, and we think that is good.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m curious to see where Knol will go, and whether anyone will make any real money from its ads. I disagree with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/23/googles-knol-the-monetizable-wikipedia/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;TechCrunch&#039;s Jason Kincaid&lt;/a&gt;, who writes that the system will draw many posts on huge topics like Barack Obama, but fail to draw articles on less popular topics. It instead encourages the opposite, since a well-written post on an obscure subject would stand out much more than a me-too article on a politician. The authoritative post would stand a better chance of showing up in search results, and thereby drawing ad revenue, for a longer period of time. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/24/wikipedia-cash-googles-knol#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1531">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1607">Sites</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2471">Wikis</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:51:30 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110548 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
