<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com." xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./node/110536/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Intel continues the WiMAX/LTE war of words</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2008/07/24/intel-continues-wimax-lte-war-words</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u2482/thumb160x_wimaxforum.png&quot; width=&quot;89&quot; height=&quot;104&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week, Intel&#039;s Gregory Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;slammed a WiMax analysis&lt;/a&gt; by Gartner, saying it was &amp;quot;devoid of reality&amp;quot; and hinting that Gartner was biased toward a rival wireless technology, LTE. The vitriolic post prompted me to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis&quot;&gt;suggest&lt;/a&gt; that perhaps next time Ofili should step back and count to ten before hitting publish on a corporate blog under Intel&#039;s flag.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/wimax_momentum_continues_with.php&quot;&gt;apologized for the &amp;quot;passion&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; in his post, but basically said that his point still stands, and Gartner is basically full of it: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;webkit-indent-blockquote&quot; style=&quot;margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 40px; border-style: none; padding: 0px&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;My point, better said after the passage of time is that WiMAX is gaining significant momentum and already has a substantial planned footprint in developing and developed economies and is destined, from my view, for delivery of next generation 4G networking capability for computing and communications.&lt;/span&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intel has written &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;three&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/will_lte_become_the_red_headed.php&quot;&gt;separate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/wimax_momentum_continues_with.php&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt; in as many days touting WiMAX and slamming competing next-generation wireless protocol LTE, including one post wondering if &amp;quot;LTE [will] become the &#039;red headed stepchild&#039; for telco&#039;s.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intel has spent billions on developing the WiMAX protocol and has staked a significant portion of its future on the platform, so it is, perhaps, unsurprising that Intel is so concerned. But you have to wonder: Why is the chip giant getting so defensive?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An examination of the telco wars is in order. Intel has an ally in WiMAX with Sprint and Clearwire. Even if Sprint is falling behind in the mobile phone wars, it is still a very big company with deep pockets. WiMAX has huge potential in rural countries with little to no infrastructure. It has already been rolled out in a number of such places, while LTE is still &amp;quot;vaporware&amp;quot; -- but perhaps all is not well in WiMAX world. An exec with an Australian company using the technology said &lt;a href=&quot;http://valleywag.com/371969/telecom-says-wimax-has-failed-miserably&quot;&gt;WiMAX has &amp;quot;failed miserably&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; and is &amp;quot;mired in opportunistic hype.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Huh. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe Intel really &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot; class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot;&gt;does&lt;/span&gt; have something to worry about. Last year Intel executive Sean Maloney &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_36/b4048401.htm&quot;&gt;said Intel still has&lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;to prove [WiMAX] was worth it.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Too bad we&#039;ve yet to see any proof.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/03/25/open-letter-intel-ceo-paul-otellini&quot;&gt;An Open Letter to Intel CEO Paul Otellini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-will-ship-10-million-iphones-2008&quot;&gt;Apple will ship 10 million iPhones in 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2008/07/24/intel-continues-wimax-lte-war-words#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/3600">co:Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/6817">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/2435">wimax</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:09:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110536 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Intel continues the WiMAX/LTE war of words</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2008/07/24/intel-continues-wimax-lte-war-words</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u2482/thumb160x_wimaxforum.png&quot; width=&quot;89&quot; height=&quot;104&quot; align=&quot;left&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Earlier this week, Intel&#039;s Gregory Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;slammed a WiMax analysis&lt;/a&gt; by Gartner, saying it was &amp;quot;devoid of reality&amp;quot; and hinting that Gartner was biased toward a rival wireless technology, LTE. The vitriolic post prompted me to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/22/intel-blogger-gets-feisty-gartner-wimax-analysis&quot;&gt;suggest&lt;/a&gt; that perhaps next time Ofili should step back and count to ten before hitting publish on a corporate blog under Intel&#039;s flag.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Ofili &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/wimax_momentum_continues_with.php&quot;&gt;apologized for the &amp;quot;passion&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; in his post, but basically said that his point still stands, and Gartner is basically full of it: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote class=&quot;webkit-indent-blockquote&quot; style=&quot;margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 40px; border-style: none; padding: 0px&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;My point, better said after the passage of time is that WiMAX is gaining significant momentum and already has a substantial planned footprint in developing and developed economies and is destined, from my view, for delivery of next generation 4G networking capability for computing and communications.&lt;/span&gt;&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intel has written &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/the_argument_for_lte_reeks_of.php&quot;&gt;three&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/will_lte_become_the_red_headed.php&quot;&gt;separate&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.intel.com/technology/2008/07/wimax_momentum_continues_with.php&quot;&gt;posts&lt;/a&gt; in as many days touting WiMAX and slamming competing next-generation wireless protocol LTE, including one post wondering if &amp;quot;LTE [will] become the &#039;red headed stepchild&#039; for telco&#039;s.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Intel has spent billions on developing the WiMAX protocol and has staked a significant portion of its future on the platform, so it is, perhaps, unsurprising that Intel is so concerned. But you have to wonder: Why is the chip giant getting so defensive?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An examination of the telco wars is in order. Intel has an ally in WiMAX with Sprint and Clearwire. Even if Sprint is falling behind in the mobile phone wars, it is still a very big company with deep pockets. WiMAX has huge potential in rural countries with little to no infrastructure. It has already been rolled out in a number of such places, while LTE is still &amp;quot;vaporware&amp;quot; -- but perhaps all is not well in WiMAX world. An exec with an Australian company using the technology said &lt;a href=&quot;http://valleywag.com/371969/telecom-says-wimax-has-failed-miserably&quot;&gt;WiMAX has &amp;quot;failed miserably&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; and is &amp;quot;mired in opportunistic hype.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Huh. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe Intel really &lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot; class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot;&gt;does&lt;/span&gt; have something to worry about. Last year Intel executive Sean Maloney &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_36/b4048401.htm&quot;&gt;said Intel still has&lt;/a&gt; &amp;quot;to prove [WiMAX] was worth it.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Too bad we&#039;ve yet to see any proof.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/03/25/open-letter-intel-ceo-paul-otellini&quot;&gt;An Open Letter to Intel CEO Paul Otellini&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-will-ship-10-million-iphones-2008&quot;&gt;Apple will ship 10 million iPhones in 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2008/07/24/intel-continues-wimax-lte-war-words#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/3600">co:Intel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/6817">LTE</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/2435">wimax</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 15:09:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110536 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
