<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/110042/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Podcasting got a black eye this week. PodTech, one of the most high-profile podcasting startups in Silicon Valley, &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/17/podtech-purchased-viewpartner-less-half-million-ending-bloody-story&quot;&gt;sold for a measly $500,000&lt;/a&gt; to a small California company named ViewPartner. That&#039;s not chump change, but considering a bunch of Sand Hill Road VCs &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.siliconbeat.com/entries/2006/03/15/podtech_raises_55_million_to_create_the_npr_of_podcasting.html&quot;&gt;plowed millions into the company&lt;/a&gt;, the price makes it apparent that the company&#039;s business model was flawed. But how much of this relates to missteps by the company, as opposed to fundamental problems with podcasting as a business? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You may recall that back in April I was slammed for posting an essay entitled &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;. The critics brought up a lot of counterarguments, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-880&quot;&gt;Podcasting isn&#039;t radio&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-879&quot;&gt;Commercial success is a matter of perspective&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-852&quot;&gt;Podcasting works within niches&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;The business model is headed toward profitability&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-875&quot;&gt;Podcasting is not a business, it&#039;s an artistic endeavor&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The comments were interesting, but they didn&#039;t make me change my original thesis: Podcasting is failing as a business platform, and has failed to make a mainstream impact. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The news that PodTech only managed to limp into an acquisition therefore came as no surprise. Former PodTech star Robert Scoble &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com/e/a93cccce-3e9c-e544-a0a8-f45303d7cbd7/PodTech-Sells-For-Less-Than-500k/&quot;&gt;admits on Friendfeed that there were plenty of management and board problems&lt;/a&gt; and notes &amp;quot;the company burned through $7 million (plus several million in revenues).&amp;quot; PodTech founder John Furrier, commenting on the same Friendfeed thread, asserts &amp;quot;we made some mistakes but [were] directionally correct.&amp;quot; Scoble says a big part of the original plan was the social media star power, supplied by the likes of Scoble, Jeremiah Owyang, Irina Slutsky, and Steve Gillmor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But even if the stars had stuck around to the end, and the management and board problems were addressed earlier, I have to wonder how well this venture would have done. This was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2005/06/21/profile-podtech/&quot;&gt;hyped business&lt;/a&gt; built on one of the most &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/25/technology/25podcast.html&quot;&gt;hyped technologies of 2005&lt;/a&gt;. Once the that faded, reality set in. As I pointed out in my original post, there are a lot of factors that are working against podcasting. Making programs is a labor-intensive process requiring special skills. In addition, there is no AdSense or AdWords equivalents for podcasts -- advertising has to be sold, produced, and placed by humans.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are problems with metrics too. &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing#comment-896&quot;&gt;While the industry is working on this&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s still a lot of work to do and it&#039;s uncertain how smaller niche podcasters will be able to benefit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for audience appeal, boosters have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com/home/archives/2008/04/the_podcast_con_1.php&quot;&gt;highlighted impressive survey data&lt;/a&gt; from an April 2008 Edison Media Research report showing 54 million people have  downloaded podcasts. But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edisonresearch.com//2008_Edison_Arbitron_Podcast_Report.pdf&quot;&gt;buried in the full PDF of the report&lt;/a&gt; are some less positive data points. The 37% of Americans who had &amp;quot;ever heard of podcasting&amp;quot; at the beginning of this year was exactly the same as the 2007 level, and podcast consumers are far more likely to be &amp;quot;resistant&amp;quot; to unwelcome advertising. The numbers of people who regularly subscribe or listen to podcasts are not even included in the report -- but, if we apply the older 12:1 ratio of &amp;quot;ever listened&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;listen daily&amp;quot; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/193/report_display.asp&quot;&gt;from a 2006 Pew report&lt;/a&gt;) to the Edison numbers, that means just over four million Americans are listening (or watching) podcasts on a given day -- out of a total population of more than 300 million Americans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What does the future hold for podcasting? The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/?ndmViewId=news_view&amp;amp;newsId=20080718005075&amp;amp;newsLang=en&quot;&gt;ViewPartner/PodTech press release&lt;/a&gt; stresses the new team&#039;s broadcast media experience and goal to take podcasting and &amp;quot;any kind of broadcasting on the &#039;Net&amp;quot; to the next level. As for other podcasting businesses, changes in technology may increase adoption rates and streamline production and advertising processes, but until that happens, podcasting-focused startups will not see the sort of giddy liquidity events that have boosted other sectors of the Internet economy in recent years. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/04/11/why-podcasting-failing&quot;&gt;Why podcasting is failing&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/27/opinion-10-net-services-will-succeed-and-10-will-probably-fail&quot;&gt;10 &#039;Net services that will succeed (and 10 that will probably fail)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/10/iphone-naysayers-one-year-later&quot;&gt;The iPhone naysayers, one year later&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Special Feature: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/05/29/where-are-they-now&quot;&gt;Where are they now? &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/18/why-podcasting-failing-part-ii-lessons-podtech#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6566">co:PodTech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/895">people:Robert Scoble</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2609">podcasting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 13:20:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110042 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
