<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/109177/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ISPs and Telstra ULLS supply dispute continues</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/07/isps-and-telstra-ulls-supply-dispute-continues</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Telstra is in dispute with six different ISPs, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission announced in a recent statement. The ACCC received separate notifications from the ISPs under Part XIC of the Trade Practices Act 1974.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The disputes relate to Telstra&#039;s supply of unconditioned local loop service (ULLS) and the monthly rental, connection and disconnection fees Telstra has charged the ISPs for the supply of the ULLS beyond 30 June.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Primus Telecommunications, Optus, XYZed, Request Broadband, PowerTel and iiNet through its wholly owned subsidiary Chime Communications have all entered a dispute process that may take more than two years to resolve.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The ACCC has been moderating those types of access disputes between Telstra and various ISPs since 1999... and this process is not efficient&quot;, said iiNet chief regulating officer Steve Dalby. &quot;It is a way for Telstra to put the brakes on competition.&quot; John Horan, a spokesperson for Primus Communications, said the company had been in dispute with Telstra since 2004-05 about the ULLS issue. &quot;It is clear that none of us [ISPs in the dispute] have been able to reach an agreement with Telstra and that is quite typical&quot;, said Horan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Parties refer a dispute to the ACCC when they cannot resolve it through private negotiations, mediation or conciliation. The ACCC does not have the power to set prices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Industry participants have charged Telstra with gaming the regime, by refusing to genuinely negotiate and seeking to draw matters out through these ACCC regulatory proceedings&quot;, said Horan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arbitration by the ACCC would be considered as a final solution for the parties in dispute. &quot;Telstra uses the arbitration process to bring about pricing uncertainty as a means to deter competition and delay competitive investment plans&quot;, said Horan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back in January 2008, the ACCC published its final determination regarding Primus&#039; dispute with Telstra over ULLS pricing but this determination has now expired. Primus is back in negotiations with Telstra and so are other ISPs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The January ULLS determination specified a monthly rental charge of $14.30 per service per month in metropolitan band 2 for 2007/2008. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/07/isps-and-telstra-ulls-supply-dispute-continues#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1546">Government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1596">Regulation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5668">Standards &amp;amp; Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1535">Telecommunication</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 07:54:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109177 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
