<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/108908/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>New deal makes “invisible” Flash content visible to search</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/06/30/new-deal-makes-invisible-flash-content-visible-search</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/adobelogo1.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-94450&quot; title=&quot;adobelogo1&quot; src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/adobelogo1.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;109&quot; height=&quot;150&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a id=&quot;k55u&quot; title=&quot;Adobe&quot; href=&quot;http://www.adobe.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adobe&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a id=&quot;t8.-&quot; title=&quot;Google&quot; href=&quot;http://www.google.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a id=&quot;_&quot; title=&quot;Yahoo&quot; href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Yahoo&lt;/a&gt; are about to make it easier to build rich multimedia websites in the Flash file format (SWF) without sacrificing any &amp;#8220;Google juice&amp;#8221; (and, um, whatever the Yahoo equivalent is). Both search engines have been developing ways to fully index Flash content without requiring any extra effort from a website owner.&lt;br id=&quot;do9l&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;tlg_&quot; /&gt; Previously, search engines indexed the &amp;#8220;static&amp;#8221; text and links on a site, falling far short of capturing all the content.&lt;br id=&quot;cpck&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;cpck0&quot; /&gt; &amp;#8220;It&amp;#8217;s like reading the index of a book, rather than the book itself,&amp;#8221; says Justin Everett-Church, a senior product manager for Flash.&lt;br id=&quot;ib0g&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;ib0g0&quot; /&gt; Now, Google and Yahoo will read the whole darn book &amp;#8212; namely, they&amp;#8217;ll use web crawlers to play through all of a Flash website&amp;#8217;s possible &amp;#8220;states,&amp;#8221; and make that content available through their search results. The previous &amp;#8220;invisibility&amp;#8221; of much Flash content to search engines has been a complaint from Flash developers and site owners, Everett-Church says.&lt;br id=&quot;u31r&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;u31r0&quot; /&gt; Bill Hunt of advertising company &lt;a id=&quot;aag1&quot; title=&quot;Ogilvy&quot; href=&quot;http://www.ogilvy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ogilvy&lt;/a&gt; tells me this move will particularly benefit &amp;#8220;big brand&amp;#8221; companies like jewelery maker &lt;a id=&quot;pd4e&quot; title=&quot;Tiffany &amp;amp; Co&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tiffany.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tiffany &amp;amp; Co&lt;/a&gt;., which has built a fancy shopping website in Flash. Until now, much of the site&amp;#8217;s content, such as individual product pages, was invisible to search engines &amp;#8212; they could only be seen by navigating the site itself, and wouldn&amp;#8217;t turn up in Google searches. For example, it&amp;#8217;s less-than-ideal that the top Google result when you search for &amp;#8220;Tiffany gold ring&amp;#8221; is &lt;a id=&quot;tgjp&quot; title=&quot;overstockjeweler.com&quot; href=&quot;http://www.overstockjeweler.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;overstockjeweler.com&lt;/a&gt;, rather than &lt;a id=&quot;x70m&quot; title=&quot;the Tiffany website&quot; href=&quot;http://www.tiffany.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;the Tiffany website&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br id=&quot;squz&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;squz0&quot; /&gt; This may be an even more significant announcement for businesses that have considered building Flash websites, but didn&amp;#8217;t want to sacrifice their search rankings &amp;#8212; now, if Google and Yahoo live up to their promises, no one will have to make that choice, removing one of Flash&amp;#8217;s big drawbacks.&lt;br id=&quot;x7ru&quot; /&gt; &lt;br id=&quot;x7ru0&quot; /&gt; Everett-Church says that Google has already started tweaking its search results, while Yahoo&amp;#8217;s development is a little further behind. Both companies are seriously pursuing this integration, he says, but I can&amp;#8217;t help noticing that for now, this is yet another advantage that Google has over Yahoo. It&amp;#8217;s hardly a huge setback, but &lt;a id=&quot;dqog&quot; title=&quot;it&amp;#039;s not like Yahoo much ground left to lose&quot; href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/06/10/hitwise-all-your-searches-belong-to-google/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;it&amp;#8217;s not like Yahoo has much ground left to lose&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br id=&quot;j4yt&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/06/30/new-deal-makes-invisible-flash-content-visible-search#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/702">Business and Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1086">co:Adobe</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/778">co:google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/861">co:yahoo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 00:00:17 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Venture Beat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108908 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
