<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/106861/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>VC investment in India small but steady</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/05/22/vc-investment-india-small-steady</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/417px-the_tortoise_and_the_hare_-_project_gutenberg_etext_19994.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-92737&quot; title=&quot;417px-the_tortoise_and_the_hare_-_project_gutenberg_etext_19994&quot; src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/417px-the_tortoise_and_the_hare_-_project_gutenberg_etext_19994.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;140&quot; height=&quot;200&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Venture investment in India had a relatively quiet first quarter &amp;#8212; VCs invested $99 million in 16 deals, according to &lt;a href=&quot;http://sev.prnewswire.com/banking-financial-services/20080522/NETH03122052008-1.html&quot;&gt;a new report&lt;/a&gt; from &lt;a href=&quot;http://venturecapital.dowjones.com&quot;&gt;Dow Jones VentureSource&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#8217;s an 80 percent drop from the same period last year, but that plummet tells us more about the investment spike in early 2007 than whether the recent quarter was particularly terrible. It&amp;#8217;s also a 27 percent drop from the fourth quarter of 2007. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/21/vcs-invest-928m-in-india-in-2007-a-166-percent-jump-from-previous-year/&quot;&gt;Yeah, last year was a record-breaking time for venture investment in India.&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Interestingly, the amount of deals held relatively steady &amp;#8212; it&amp;#8217;s the deal size that shrank. That&amp;#8217;s pretty much the exact opposite of what happened in China (the other country seen as the standard-bearer in overseas venture growth), where the number of deals fell, &lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/05/21/vc-investment-in-china-increases-by-46-percent/&quot;&gt;but the amount of money per deal grew, causing a 46 percent year-over-year boost&lt;/a&gt;. How big is the difference? In India, the median deal size was $4.1 million; in China, it was $10 million. The United States fell in between, with a median size of $7.1 million.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A single company, &lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2006/12/12/indian-travel-site-cleartrip-raises-8m-from-dag-ventures-because-dag-can-react-within-48-hours/&quot;&gt;Mumbai-based ClearTrip Travel Services&lt;/a&gt;, accounted for more than one-fourth of all the venture dollars invested, with a $26 million third round.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/05/22/vc-investment-india-small-steady#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/702">Business and Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 10:39:45 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Venture Beat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">106861 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
