<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/105473/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Is Twitter worth $75 million? $150 million? How about none of the above?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/twitter-worth-75-million-150-million-how-about-none-above</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt; I had to chuckle when I read the Twitter valuation analyses published by VentureBeat and Silicon Alley Insider. You may remember that The Standard has not been too friendly to Twitter recently -- it...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/twitter-worth-75-million-150-million-how-about-none-above&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/twitter-worth-75-million-150-million-how-about-none-above#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/787">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3856">microblogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2725">Twitter</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1034">Yahoo</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 16:07:35 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont356769</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">105473 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
