<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/103722/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Airspan blames customer for poor WiMax performance</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/03/25/airspan-blames-customer-poor-wimax-performance</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After Australian broadband operator Buzz Broadband slammed WiMax as a &amp;quot;disaster,&amp;quot; its equipment supplier Airspan has hit back, saying the performance issues were not its fault. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The controversy started at a WiMax conference in Bangkok. Buzz CEO Garth Freeman gave his take on WiMax in a speech at the conference, saying it may not work and that the technology is still mired in opportunistic hype, according to a report from the conference by Commsday.com.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He also said performance out of line of sight was nonexistent beyond 2 kilometers from the base station, indoor performance decayed at just 400 meters, and latency is unacceptable for IP telephony, according to the report.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Freeman said Buzz has now abandoned WiMax in favor of other technologies, according to Commsday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Airspan, which shipped the equipment Buzz used, isn&#039;t turning the other cheek, and is now hitting back at Buzz, saying the technical and financial resources of Buzz Broadband were not sufficient to deploy a functioning network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Buzz rejected outside help, he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With regard to range Buzz Broadband opted to go with the less-expensive micro-cell base stations in order to reduce cost. This was a well understood trade-off of cost versus range, according to Airspan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vendor also blames Buzz for bad IP telephony performance, saying Airspan technical services determined that Buzz&#039;s back-haul network was considerably under-dimensioned, again to save cost, and lacked sufficient quality of service, and that these factors were the direct cause of VOIP (voice over IP) quality issues in the network.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Buzz&#039;s allegations, even when so easily dismissed, are a distraction to the WiMax industry,&amp;quot; said Declan Byrne, chief marketing officer at Airspan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The war of words between Buzz and Airspan doesn&#039;t come as a surprise to Gartner analyst Martin Gutberlet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Arguments about performance are to be expected, as both vendors and carriers learn what WiMax can and can&#039;t do, he said. &amp;quot;WiMax is still a relatively new technology.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Michael Blomqvist, CEO of Nordic Nowire, an Airspan reseller, isn&#039;t surprised either, and he feels Airspan has to take some of the blame.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The WiMax vendors, Airspan included, need to a larger responsibility when it comes to educating carriers&amp;quot; said Blomqvist, calling the mistakes Buzz has made classic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vendors have over-hyped WiMax, promising features and then not delivering, Blomqvist said, but he feels WiMax has a better price/performance ratio compared to competing mobile broadband technologies, when done right.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related news, commentary, and predictions:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/sprint-nextel-and-clearwire-wimax-network-service-announce-partnership&quot;&gt;Sprint Nextel and Clearwire WiMAX network/service announce partnership&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/predictions/next-iphone-release-date-not-august-2008&quot;&gt;The next iPhone - release date not before August 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Larry Borsato: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/02/28/communications-why-do-we-accept-less-99-999&quot;&gt;Communications: Why do we accept less than 99.999%?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Larry Borsato: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/11/communications-price-all-matters&quot;&gt;Communications: Is price all that matters?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Larry Borsato: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/24/whatever-happened-ubiquitous-wi-fi&quot;&gt;Whatever happened to ubiquitous Wi-Fi?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Note:&lt;/b&gt; Anonymous comments on &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt; are disabled. To leave a comment and participate in the Standard&#039;s &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/predictions&quot;&gt;prediction market&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;, please &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/user/register?destination=search/predictions&quot;&gt;register&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; first.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/03/25/airspan-blames-customer-poor-wimax-performance#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1614">Broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5662">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1621">Mobile broadband</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1426">Networking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1535">Telecommunication</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 05:19:11 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">103722 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
