<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title></title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/node/101730/comments</link>
 <description>comments feed.</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>IPO status board: The good, the bad and the pending</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/21/ipo-status-board-good-bad-and-pending</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Now that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bioheartinc.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bioheart&lt;/a&gt; IPO has doubly surprised everyone — first by happening at all, and second by coming out on &lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/02/19/three-yards-and-a-cloud-of-dust-bioheart-makes-it-across-the-ipo-goal-line-but-with-little-to-show-for-its-struggles/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;such dreadful terms&lt;/a&gt; for the company — perhaps it’s time to take a closer look at exactly where the 2008 offering market for life-science companies stands. In fact, I’ll aim to make this a regular feature, because the IPO market is still a useful leading indicator for venture funding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipohome-logo.gif&quot; title=&quot;ipohome-logo.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipohome-logo.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ipohome-logo.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Data for the following analysis comes courtesy of Renaissance Capital’s site &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipohome.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;IPOHome&lt;/a&gt;, which is a pretty standout resource for this kind of thing. Twenty-three life-science startups are currently queued up for takeoff, although only two have even established a price range. Of the three that have made it through the IPO gate this year, only one — healthcare provider IPC — has seen its shares rise, while investors have greeted both MAKO Surgical and Bioheart with something less than enthusiasm. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Three startups have postponed their offerings indefinitely, while another five have withdrawn them outright. It’s looking pretty likely that we’ll see these numbers swell further before long.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are the numbers:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pending IPOs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-pending-2-21-08.gif&quot; title=&quot;ipo-pending-2-21-08.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-pending-2-21-08-580px.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ipo-pending-2-21-08.gif&quot; vspace=&quot;20&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Priced IPOs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-priced-2-21-08-580px.gif&quot; title=&quot;ipo-priced-2-21-08-580px.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-priced-2-21-08-580px.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ipo-priced-2-21-08-580px.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Withdrawn IPOs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-withdrawn-2-21-08.gif&quot; title=&quot;ipo-withdrawn-2-21-08.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-withdrawn-2-21-08.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ipo-withdrawn-2-21-08.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Postponed IPOs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-postponed-2-21-08.gif&quot; title=&quot;ipo-postponed-2-21-08.gif&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/ipo-postponed-2-21-08.gif&quot; alt=&quot;ipo-postponed-2-21-08.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Venturebeat?a=wxF9iC&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/Venturebeat?i=wxF9iC&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/21/ipo-status-board-good-bad-and-pending#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2655">ipo</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2847">IPO withdrawal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2810">lifesciences</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:38:05 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Venture Beat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">101730 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
