Thunderdome

« Back to the top page
IDG News Service

Confessions of an Apple Manager-Turned-iPhone App Creator

Tom Kaneshige , CIO11.12.2009
Tags
Comments 0
Like the story? Get Alerts of big news events. Enter your email address

Pity the startup iPhone app developer whose novel idea usually lasts about a day in the App Store. Dave Howell, CEO of Avatron Software, is one of those guys. The former Apple employee started his own company and came out with one of the first document viewers for the iPhone.

Howell's flagship app, called Air Sharing, hit the App Store nearly a year ago to great fanfare. Today, it competes with some 200 apps.

The App Store has become the Wild West where apps spring up seemingly overnight. It's where an app's logo suddenly takes on enormous importance. Some 100,000 apps now line the virtual shelves of the App Store, which opened its doors only a little more than a year ago.

Howell had worked at small companies before joining Apple in 2002. He spent six years at Apple in various managerial and engineering roles. Bitten by the startup bug, he enrolled in Cornell University's weekend MBA program and, in 2008, quit Apple to start Avatron.

Former Apple employee Dave Howell leads his startup Avatron Software in the iPhone's wild frontier.

Now Howell must guide Avatron through the dynamic world of the iPhone app marketplace. It's a world where unpredictability and opportunity go hand-in-hand, frustration an everyday occurrence, and constant innovation the key to survival.

CIO.com spoke with Howell about the early days of the App Store, his Apple experience and how he plans to stay a step ahead of the competition.

You went from a big company with a closed, paranoid culture to your own startup. How was that transition?

At Apple, I gained an appreciation for all the process you get at a large organization. I had always been a sort of lone wolf working at start-ups and small companies. I was dragged into Apple kicking and screaming [when Apple acquired his previous company] but later really appreciated the power and discipline of it.

The paranoia and secrecy was always frustrating but not as hard as I thought it would be. It was more my fear. For the most part, Apple's processes just work really well. Another frustration with a big company, not just Apple, is that if you have what you think is a great idea, there may just be nobody there to listen to it.

Now, it's not the case at all. We have the nimbleness of a little group. Avatron has seven employees. We just hired two engineers. We're brainstorming every day about features, new apps, new opportunities-it's a lot more fun.

How was Air Sharing received?

We gave it away for two weeks and later set the price at $7, lowered it to $5 and then introduced a more capable one for $10. I was optimistically thinking maybe 100,000 people would download it. But really I thought that was crazy talk.

As it turned out, a million downloaded it in two weeks-168,000 in the first day. That's without advertising, no banner ads. It was just word-of-mouth and the power of the Internet.

We've done other apps, but that app has pretty much kept us afloat. We're profitable almost exclusively on the power of Air Sharing and now Air Sharing Pro, which came out in May this year.

Today, the number of unique users is around 1.3 million. That will overstate the total a bit, because some users will have purchased both the classic and Pro versions. The number of total active users is currently around 200,000. Less than a quarter of Air Sharing Pro users are in the U.S.

What does the competitive landscape look like?

When we started [development], there were no other apps that did that. By the time we finished, two other apps had already come out, which is why we did the free version for two weeks. Now there are at least 200 apps that view documents.

To be fair, there are only three we're really concerned with. They are really good competitors, focusing on one small part. One is called Good Reader, which is very


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Respectful debate is welcome, but comments that are defamatory, indecent, abusive, or in violation of any law will be removed.