Thunderdome

« Back to the top page
Lincoln Spector

Google blasts click fraud report, says AdSense estimates are wrong

Lincoln Spector01.30.2009
Tags
Comments 2
clickforensics.jpg
Like the story? Get Alerts of big news events. Enter your email address

Click Forensics says that more than a quarter of clicks on ads served by Google and similar companies are fraudulent. Google disagrees.

Earlier this week, Click Forensics released a report stating that 17.1 percent of the clicks on pay-per-click (PPC) advertisements last year were fraudulent. The rate was 28.2 percent for search engine ad providers like Google AdSense and the Yahoo Publisher Network.

But Google puts the number of invalid clicks much lower. In a terse statement attributed only to a "spokesperson," Google says only that "These estimates continue to count clicks Google does not charge to advertisers as fraudulent, so they are not actually click fraud estimates. Furthermore, their estimates have never reflected the invalid click rates we see at Google, which we have previously stated have remained in the range of less than 10% of all clicks every quarter since we launched AdWords in 2002."

Google has criticized Click Forensics' numbers before, and gone into more detail. Two years ago, Google analyst Shuman Ghosemajumder posted a long commentary on his private blog about the issue. "We did an analysis of Click Forensics and other click fraud consultants back in August 2006 to see why their numbers were so inflated ...We found serious flaws in their counting of clicks -- a more fundamental issue than their counting of click fraud."

He also argued that, because of these "basic counting mistakes," Click Forensics was "consistently classifying an advertiser's best users (the ones spending time browsing their site) as fraudulent."

On the other hand, at SearchEngineWatch.com, Frank Watson wrote a piece skeptical of Google's skepticism. "I've been involved with the Click Quality Council and know the people at Click Forensics, and I have to think Google doesn't want to admit to click fraud."

"This situation needs to be addressed" he argues. "But so long as the CPA [cost per action] is acceptable, fighting it is just a way to make search even more profitable."


Comments

Google doesn't want to admit click fraud? Well that's not news! There's a healthy effort at denial between them and Yahoo on this, and meanwhile, the rest of us are paying out the nose.

I'm a small business owner, and to stay afloat online, I switched over to Sortprice.com for my retail listings. No CPC/CPA, just one fee per month. I definitely recommend it to anyone who is sick and tired of the nonsense being perpetrated by Google et. al.

www.sortprice.com


This is a major is issue with most CPC comparison shopping search engines. As a business owner, I believe that click fraud is still an issue. I transferred my listings to Onewayshopping.com to take advantage of their reasonable flat rate per month.

www.onewayshopping.com


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Respectful debate is welcome, but comments that are defamatory, indecent, abusive, or in violation of any law will be removed.