« Back to the top page
Jordan Golson

John Battelle thinks PageRank is "deeply broken", kind of

Jordan Golson, The Industry Standard09.30.2008
Tags
Comments 1
Like the story? Get Alerts of big news events. Enter your email address

Federated Media adman and search master John Battelle (who, incidentally, founded The Industry Standard a long time ago) has a bone to pick with a technology at the heart of Google's empire: PageRank. 

Google uses the technology to measure and rank the importance of Web pages. The algorithm developed by Larry, Sergey & co. considers "more than 500 million variables and 2 billion terms" and somehow boils all that down to a number between 0 and 10. The higher the PageRank, the "more important" the webpage is and the higher it ranks in search results.

Battelle's beef: Google doesn't give any detailed information on how it assigns a particular rank to a site. "It's just deeply broken -- not because there isn't data that informs all of our collective rank. But because we have no idea what that data really is, or how it's combined to determine value in the Google economy," Battelle said on his blog.

Battelle also told me that "PageRank is a totem for Google juju. It feeds mysticism." Battelle doesn't have a problem with PageRank per se, just that we get a sliver of information -- a number, 0-10 -- and nothing else.

It's highly unlikely that Google will release any additional information about how it determines PageRank. It's a proprietary technology, and competitors and scammers would benefit from its release. All Google will say about PageRank is that "important pages receive a higher PageRank and appear at the top of the search results."

Should Google shareholders care about this debate? Not really. Regardless of whether the company releases a few tidbits of information about PageRank, the company will continue to make buckets of money from search advertising unless something better comes along.

(AP Photo/Noah Berger)

More news, commentary, and predictions from The Industry Standard:

 


Comments

Hi Jordan, You must have taken John's stuff out of context in a big way. There is no way he stated anything about what you wrote. You are missing many things about PR. Your article is actually very false as it stands. Sorry, but I really wish people outside of our industry actually learned about stuff before they write stuff on prominent news sites. If you all would simply ask those of us in the know about things having to do with Google and SEO, you would be much better off.

My 2 cents.


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Respectful debate is welcome, but comments that are defamatory, indecent, abusive, or in violation of any law will be removed.