Add web browers to the list of things Google does well. The Mountain View-based search giant debuted its new web browser today in a public beta, and I’ve spent most of the afternoon poking around the web and seeing how Chrome performs. The verdict? While it’s still a few iterations from displacing Firefox as my browser of choice, Chrome already provides a much more pleasant web experience than Microsoft’s newest competitor Internet Explorer 8 (also in beta).

The Good

The first thing that pops out is the screen size. Because Chrome gets rid of menus and melds the search bar and URL bar into one “Omnibar,” the browser feels like its always running in full-screen mode. For browsing, this means about an extra half-inch of web pages is viewable. That may not seem like much, but it makes a huge difference, particularly when, like me, you spend a great deal of your day reading from web pages.

The decision to put tabs at the top of the page also reduces clutter. Even better is that tabs are grouped together. If I click a link from one page, the resulting page will show up in tab appearing directly next to the tab I’m using, and not at the end of the line. In practice, this means that my tabs stay relevant to the ones near by them, which is helpful considering by the end of the day I can have twenty open tabs to sort through.

It’s also fast — or least is fast in certain things. In loading some web pages, I noticed that Chrome seemed a bit pokier than Firefox, like Walt Mossberg notes. But when using web apps like Gmail or Facebook, Chrome was noticeably faster. Google Reader in particular seemed to be much more responsive, without the half-second lag I experienced in Firefox.

Also useful is Incognito, a feature that allows you to surf through web pages without dirtying up your search or browser history. You also have the option to right-click while surfing in regular mode, and open a link into Incognito mode.

Finally, Chrome’s homepage is one of those feature that once you’ve used it, you’ll wonder why every other browser doesn’t do the same thing. The homepage provides a look at your most visited web pages, which becomes immediately useful after a few hours of use: By showing me quickly where I tend to go on the web, Chrome cuts down the time I spend sifting through bookmarks or typing in URLs, and does it in a way that feels utterly intuitive.

The Bad

The browser never crashed on me, but it did seem to have a few hiccups when dealing with Flash apps. A Flash game at popular portal Kongregate hung up on me, and videos at Funny or Die seemed choppier than in Firefox. And Chrome’s claim to fame — that if one tab suddenly starts going haywire, the rest of them are fine — didn’t seem to work in reality for me. When Chrome choked on Flash, all tabs suffered equally.

The lack of Firefox add-ons is also sorely noticeable. Without the Greasemonkey scripts I’ve come to rely on, something felt wrong. It felt like when I try to use a Mac (I’m a PC owner), and keep trying to use the non-existent right click button. Chrome doesn’t currently allow for browser extensions, which curtails how useful it can be — although that functionality is coming. Chrome is also currently only available for Windows, and Google isn’t saying exactly when Mac and Linux ports will be coming.

While Google’s new V8 Java engine did seem to speed up many applications, at least according to one Java speed test, Firefox is still a bit fleeter, and Safari is the fastest of all. IE 8 was the