After witnessing countless corparate attempts to patent common practices or trademark common terms, and seeing the resulting PR fallout, one would think that companies would just stop trying. Dell, however, seems to think that it should be able to trademark the term "cloud computing," a phrase that entered the tech lexicon many years ago to describe software processing that takes place on a distributed network, such as the Internet.
The trademark application (serial number 77139082) was noted by Sam Johnston, a member of the Cloud Computing group on Google Groups, and mentioned on the Elastic Vapor blog.
Dell is not the only company to go after this term. The first trademark application was made in 1998 under serial number 75291765 by NetCentric Corporation, a company that used to provide "carrier-class Internet fax technology." The application was killed less than a year later. Dell's application is dated March 23, 2007, well after the first mention I was able to find of the term, which appeared as "cloud" and "cloud network" in the New York Times in 2001.
Considering that cloud computing is a generic term that's been used countless times in articles, papers, and books, it would seem obvious that the trademark application should be killed. It was published for opposition April 15 of this year, and the definition submitted in the trademark application makes it clear that Dell is covering all potential use of the term, and not restricting it to a cloud computing platform of its own specific design:
IC 040. US 100 103 106. G & S: Custom manufacture of computer hardware for use in data centers and mega-scale computing environments for others
IC 042. US 100 101. G & S: Design of computer hardware for use in data centers and mega-scale computing environments for others; customization of computer hardware for use in data centers and mega-scale computing environments for others; design and development of networks for use in data centers and mega-scale computing environments for others; Consulting services for data centers and mega-scale computing environments in the fields of design, selection, implementation, customization and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting services for data centers and mega-scale computing environments in the fields of design, selection, implementation, customization and use of computer hardware and software systems for others
Dell was generous enough to note in the application that the term "computing" on its own was not being trademarked.
Note: The patent applications referenced in this article can be viewed by searching the Trademark Electronic Search Engine (TESS) for either the application serial number or a general search for "cloud computing."
More news, commentary, and predictions from The Industry Standard:
- Prediction: Microsoft will release a competitor to Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud by end of 2008
- Analysis: Why podcasting is failing, part II: Lessons from PodTech
- Special Feature: The iPhone naysayers, one year later
- Special Feature: Where are they now? The Industry Standard tracks down 10 dot-coms from the Web bubble of the late 1990s









Comments
Cyndy,
I'm a trademark attorney, and Dell has done more than just "try" to use the trademark. The application was published for opposition, no one lodged any complaints, and now the trademark will proceed to registration (once Dell submits examples of its trademark use). The mark can later be disputed once it is registered by anyone who believes they will be harmed by the registration of the trademark by Dell. Examining Attorneys at the USPTO usually catch phrases that are generally used by the public, thus I am surprised they let this one through with approval.
Here's a direct link to check the status of the application: http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=77139082
I have owned the domain www.cloudnetwork.com for over ten years now and most of the Cloud names. I can show prood of this to the trademark lawyersand have it on my website so saddened by this.
Owen, based on the trademark for Web 2.0, I don't think they usually catch these. Same way they don't seem to catch the patent apps for commonplace business practices. Note Cheray's comment after yours; even a simple Google search would have shown that the phrase in question was in widespread use. The problem, too, is that companies don't seem to be required to promote their applications. The application was only found during a search for something else.
Don't you just love how sensible people really are? How about trademarks for the -AaS? That would be quite many; Platform, software, security ...
Heading out to the IP office.
Best.
alain
www.mor.ph
Post new comment