« Back to the top page
IDG News Service
Like the story? Get Alerts of big news events. Enter your email address

The New Zealand public will be consulted on the controversial international Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA), details of which were leaked on the whistleblower website wikileaks.org.

Contrary to scepticism expressed in blogs and mailing-list discussions, there will be more than one opportunity for public comment on the provisions of ACTA, says George Wardle, who is coordinating local response at the Ministry of Economic Development.

Culture and Heritage Minister Judith Tizard has requested submissions on the still tentative ACTA proposal with a deadline of July 14. At that time, international government agencies will only be at their second meeting on the topic, with several different aspects still to be discussed.

This has led to the suspicion that the consultation will be merely, in the words of one local commentator, "a rubber stamp."

The leaked document is a preliminary draft prepared by U.S. and Japanese representatives and there is no definitive text for the proposed agreement yet, Wardle says.

"But there will be an opportunity for public comment after we have a text and before [New Zealand] ministers are asked to make a decision," he says.

If the ministers decide to proceed, he says, there will be a subsequent "national-interest analysis" which will involve another round of public comment.

If the text presents particular problems of disagreement with domestic legislation, then there will be additional consultation with pertinent parties such as copyright owners and the agencies that will police the agreement, Wardle says.

"What we are seeking [with the present consultation] is information from the public on what should be the focus of New Zealand's participation in ACTA ... what should New Zealand be trying to achieve through participation in the negotiations and what matters should New Zealand seek to have covered in such an agreement," he says in a comment provided under an Official Information Act request to former State Services Commission man Mark Harris.

Wardle was not able to say when a definitive text of the agreement might be available.

"We had the first meeting [earlier this month] of proposed participant countries," he said last week, and a summary of discussions will be placed on the MED website. The next meeting is scheduled to be around the middle of next month. "We should finish discussing border protection and start on civil enforcement. After that, there's criminal enforcement and other bits and pieces."

He says many of the ACTA provisions are already covered by the 1994 TRIPS (Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights) agreement, which New Zealand has signed.

Although ACTA will strengthen border control on imports and goods transiting through New Zealand, it is directed at preventing piracy and counterfeiting "on a commercial scale," he says. It will not mean Customs examining individual travellers' laptops or suitcases for single infringing items.

Exports from NZ are not currently earmarked for ACTA attention as this country is not considered a large-scale source of pirated goods Wardle says.

"There has been a lot of speculation online about what any actor [person or agency connected with the agreement] will or will not do, but it's premature," he says.

Reprinted with permission from Computerworld New Zealand. Story copyright 2008 Computerworld New Zealand Inc. All rights reserved.

Comments

A few questions for the trade officials involved:

- If ACTA is really as harmless as Mark Harris claims, why not make the treaty drafts and proceedings transparent and publicly available?

- If TRIPS is such a good agreement, why negotiate this one outside of the WTO?

- If it won't really add anything to existing regulations, why do we need ACTA anyway?

- If it's only about commercial scale infringement, why does the wikileaks discussion paper from the USTR include language about non-commercial infringement and phrases that could be understood to imply support for ISP filtering?


I agree with Aaron Shaw - but perhaps it should also be asked why such discussions are outside of the IP intorg, ie. WIPO & its Development Agenda?

- If TRIPS is such a good agreement, why negotiate this one outside of the WTO?


Whoa! Hold up there. I made no claim regarding ACTA being "harmless"; I made an OIA request because I want to know how harmful it is, which Geoge Wardle responded to. I made the request because I am concerned that a) there is planning going on for yet another restriction of copyright, b) there is no information about the planning for interested parties (i.e. people like us) to the point of involved parties having to sign non-disclosure agreements and c) the consultation period is too short when nothing is available for discussion.

Stephen did ask if he could quote the correspondence (it was on the NZOSS list) and I said yes but he's stepped too far in describing me as "former State Services Commission man" as if implying I still had some connection. It is true I used to work there but for the last 3 years I have been a provate consultant on a bunch of things, including copyright. I certainly have no involvement in ACTA negotiation, nor do I neceaasrily approve of it (I think, but can't be sure until I see some documents, which MED has yet to supply.)


Just checked my archive. It wasn't Stephen who asked to quote, it was someone else. I don't mind being quoted, however, just misrepresented (if only by implication).


[a href="http://www.gupiao110.com"]股票论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.zuojia168.com"]作家论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.youxi119.com"]游戏论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.ruanjian168.com"]软件工程师论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.lingao168.com"]临高论坛[/a]


Check out our large selection of [a href="http://www.mmoinn.com/"]WoW gold[/a] .
We have [a href="http://www.cheap-wow-gold-eu.com.cn"]World of Warcraft gold[/a] for selling,
[a href="http://www.cheap-wowgold-us.org.cn/"]cheap wow gold[/a] making, instances and tons more.
[a href="http://www.cheapwow-gold-eu.com.cn/"]buy wow gold[/a] to every aspect for
[a href="http://www.cheap-wow-gold-eu.org.cn/"]wow gold[/a]. Every class and every profession 1-375.
[a href="http://www.cheapwow-gold-eu.org.cn"]wow powerlevelling[/a], [a href="http://www.cheapwowgold-eu.org.cn"]Warcraft gold[/a],
spell damage, spell hit.


[a href="http://www.gupiao110.com"]股票论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.zuojia168.com"]作家论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.youxi119.com"]游戏论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.ruanjian168.com"]软件工程师论坛[/a]
[a href="http://www.lingao168.com"]临高论坛[/a]


Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Respectful debate is welcome, but comments that are defamatory, indecent, abusive, or in violation of any law will be removed.