<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com." xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Prediction - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com.</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Prediction&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Rich: I agree that most</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/apple-announces-imac-retirement-december-31-2009#comment-13907</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Rich: I agree that most people will have far fewer issues with a new Mac than a new PC. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue that must be considered is price. There is a huge population of people and bulk purchasers (think schools) who might have shelled out money for an iMac two years ago who now simply can&#039;t afford it. Some may put off new computer purchases until their own cash picture improves, but others will grit their teeth and go for some of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/12/18/beginning-end-apple-imac#comment-13350&quot;&gt;cheap PC&lt;/a&gt; and netbook alternatives. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple doesn&#039;t break out iMac sales, but I would expect that the bulk of its Mac revenue is now derived from low-end MacBooks where the price/features comparison is attractive enough when true Windows laptops (as opposed to cheap netbooks) are the alternative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:19:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13907 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If Mac sales defy logic,</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/apple-announces-imac-retirement-december-31-2009#comment-13906</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;If Mac sales defy logic, then the logic is flawed or someone is lacking some relevant data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having spent over a decade as a PC, my new world is faster, easier and I hope to be exploited with this improved Mac experience for many years to come.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PCs are a mixed bag of nuts.  Just imagine if every win 95 machine for 10 bucks could have upgraded to win 98, and another 10 bucks and win 98 would be upgraded to win 2000.  Microsoft won&#039;t do it&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Mac facilitates those OS upgrades instead of overcharging and rushing out more troubles.  If your hardware is compatible, you can simply stay in the latest OS, all the time, for chump change.  Most Mac users stay up with latest OS, so we are all having the same (great) experience.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PC defenders simply have not spent the time with Mac.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I will be picking up 2 27&quot; new imacs within the week.  1 for desk and TV type usage, one for an office desktop.  Better choices?  Maybe.  But I will get more years out of these machines than most PCs can give.  With far fewer issues.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 16:03:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Rich Webber</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13906 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;ll add my voice to the</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/iphone-verizon-announced-june-30-2009#comment-13899</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I&#039;ll add my voice to the Pleas[e] ...Please Verizon: take all the lessons from AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s fumbling and the clear message about the public&#039;s Willingness To Buy - there is NO WTB QUESTION here - and build a network to support all of us AT&amp;amp;T Users who are ready to jump.  2 points from me: [1] I had a V1 iPhoney and spiked it after the umpteenth dropped call one busy Friday afternoon and [2] I just spent the week in San Francisco with my BB Curve - still with AT&amp;amp;T - and the EDGE service - as well as my colleagues&#039; 3G iPhoney service - was abysmal.  Network &#039;Busy&#039; signals, &#039;call failed&#039; messages with multi-bars showing, and dropped calls were constant: 2-3 such annoyances for every call made/attempted.  AT&amp;amp;T should just quit pretending, because they have obviously quit trying to run a network that functions, let alone &#039;provides service&#039;, in SF.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Verizon: this is your chance to skim the cream of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s customers and put T back into the primordial garbage dump from which this miserable excuse of a mobile operator has reared its ugly head.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple: you need to do the deal with Verizon because continuing AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s monopoly will drive everyone away to other handset hardware and the iToons tie-in won&#039;t be enough to overcome the inadequacy of AT&amp;amp;T&#039;s support of your otherwise wonderful device. The problem is that there is no telephoney app in the App Store.  You need it, to complete the offering and maintain your market power.  Announce the deal before Xmas so nobody will be tempted to buy anything until the Verizon deal is live.  I&#039;ll wait, and I suspect many others will too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:55:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Kennedy Brooks</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13899 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>why is this here? this has</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/nintendo-wii-ditches-opera-internet-browser-firefox#comment-13897</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;why is this here? this has nothing to do with firefox or wii&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:24:32 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>travis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13897 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Judged! Closed yesterday</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/microsoft-msft-closes-above-30-following-windows-7-launch#comment-13895</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judged! Closed yesterday above $30.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:21:33 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13895 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Industry Standard</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/linkedin-announces-ipo-intentions-july-2010-0#comment-13886</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;The Industry Standard stealing our way of creating sensationalist headlines?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:02:59 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Fox News</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13886 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Online advertising grows</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/u-s-online-advertising-grows-10-2009#comment-13884</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Online advertising grows with more than 10% in US? I guess a lot of people put their hopes in advertising to overcome the financial crisis consequences. That&#039;s tells a lot about people&#039;s perceptions on marketing in general.&lt;br /&gt;
Regg, &lt;a rel=&quot;follow&quot; href=&quot;http://www.dmconfidential.com/blogs/category/Press_Releases/1907/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Clickbooth&lt;/a&gt; agent&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:57:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>regg anders</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13884 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Sounds like a vote of</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/microsoft-msft-closes-above-30-following-windows-7-launch#comment-13881</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sounds like a vote of confidence in Windows 7. Or general optimism about the economy?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:52:03 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13881 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft is currently at</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/microsoft-msft-closes-above-30-following-windows-7-launch#comment-13880</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Microsoft is currently at $29.86, two weeks before judgement.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 12:03:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tay Bass</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13880 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Judged. The word from the</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/it-salaries-almost-flat-compared-last-year#comment-13879</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judged. The word from the editor for the Computerworld Salary Survey package: &quot;Total comp (salary + bonus) is down 0.4%.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:32:06 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13879 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Judged. The total</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/cto-compensation-will-decline-least-3#comment-13878</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judged. The total compensation for CTOs in this year&#039;s Salary Survey is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/salary-survey/breakdown/2009/job_level/5&quot;&gt;listed&lt;/a&gt; as $135,633 -- that&#039;s a drop of close to 20% from the total compensation listed on the 2008 survey, and a 4.7% drop from the self-reported 2008 levels submitted by survey participants this year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:29:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13878 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This was an official</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/aol-formally-splits-time-warner-dec-11#comment-13873</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;This was an official confirmation, so it suffices. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The press release makes does not come out and say all of the required approvals are granted, but judging by past comments from Armstrong and others saying that they were waiting for federal approval, it seems that they got the nod from the feds they were looking for.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:06:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13873 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Based on David&#039;s link, this</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/aol-formally-splits-time-warner-dec-11#comment-13872</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Based on David&#039;s link, this prediction is judged.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Man, you are fast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:00:16 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont779313</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13872 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spin off to take effect Dec</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/aol-formally-splits-time-warner-dec-11#comment-13871</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timewarner.com/corp/newsroom/pr/0,20812,1939809,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Spin off to take effect Dec 9&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:53:53 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13871 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Does a majority shareholders</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/aol-formally-splits-time-warner-dec-11#comment-13870</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Does a majority shareholders vote meet the criteria or must there be formal regulatory approval?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:44:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13870 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
