<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Mary Meeker Speaks, But Probably Shouldn&amp;#039;t - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C24064%2C00.html</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Mary Meeker Speaks, But Probably Shouldn&#039;t&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Mary Meeker Speaks, But Probably Shouldn&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C24064%2C00.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	The Net analyst&#039;s fall from media grace seems worthy of one of those trashy &quot;whatever-happened-to&quot; bio movies on cable TV. Mary Meeker has been MIA in the media lately as reporters routinely dismiss her as the lead villain in the destruction of dot-com stocks. She makes a high-profile return in the April 30 issue of Business Week, but don&#039;t be fooled by the gushing headline (&quot;Tech&#039;s Cheerleader Won&#039;t Say Die&quot;). The piece won&#039;t restore her respectability.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you believe BW reporter Steve Hamm, it&#039;s &quot;unlikely that Meeker will resume her reign as queen of anything in the near future.&quot; After tallying that nine of the 21 stocks Meeker recommended now trade below their IPO prices, Hamm quoted a finance professor calling Meeker and the other Net analysts &quot;an incredible embarrassment to the investment-banking industry.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meeker is depicted as being clearly rattled by the demonization, but Hamm lets her have her say – and that&#039;s part of her problem. The slim reed of hope on which she pins her redemption? Sure, it seems nutty for her to still be backing Yahoo and Amazon.com, but she&#039;s been called wrong before. She continued to recommend AOL after most analysts abandoned it in 1996, and investors who followed her AOL advice back then could have spun a $160 investment into $4,300. But does anyone but Meeker still think that the brand value of Yahoo, Amazon and eBay is comparable to consumer titans like Pepsi and Kleenex? The big dot-coms should eventually be able to cash in on their audiences, she told Hamm. Meeker certainly did.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_18/b3730088.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Tech&#039;s Cheerleader Won&#039;t Say Die&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Business Week
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_18/b3730091.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;QA with Mary Meeker: &#039;We Had One Heck of a Feast&#039;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Business Week
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_18/b3730090.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Resume: Mary G. Meeker&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Business Week
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1251">Media And Marketing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2001 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Baldwin Louie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">90426 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
