<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Microsoft Rolls On, and Over, the Media - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C27035%2C00.html</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Microsoft Rolls On, and Over, the Media&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft Rolls On, and Over, the Media</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C27035%2C00.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	Hear that whacking? It&#039;s the sound of Microsoft snipping back its marketing budget. With press clips like Redmond&#039;s been getting, why spend the money?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&#039;s stock is up 60 percent this year, and the software giant plans to roll out a string of new products, making Bill Gates a popular cover boy for Fortune and Business Week. The only thing missing from their reviews of his company&#039;s elaborate plans is scrutiny.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Just about any software application on your PC and even on your cell phone or PDA will tap directly into interactive services to make work and life easier to manage,&quot; Fortune enthused, pointing out without the slightest hint of irony that since there&#039;s no business model for the subscription software services that Microsoft is drooling over, Redmond will simply have to invent one.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fortune missed a golden opportunity to question Microsoft&#039;s chances for convincing customers to begin paying for their software in perpetuity – a radical idea on which the company is betting heavily. Fortune explains this away by arguing that Microsoft is in creative mode. Substitute the Microsoft cheerleading with a few prognostications about online sales, or maybe the wonders of DSL, and you&#039;ve got the kind of unquestioning journalism that business scribes said they had sworn off during the post-bubble mop up.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At least Business Week was more circumspect, warning that Microsoft&#039;s &quot;heavy lifting has just begun.&quot; The magazine also described the move to subscription software as &quot;monumental,&quot; but beyond that, BW, too, offered little context for an unproven idea. Yes, it&#039;s possible that consumers can be coaxed into seeing software as a monthly service, but isn&#039;t it also possible the strategy will be a dud, as wrongheaded as the idea that &quot;the Web will change everything&quot;? Neither Fortune nor Business Week examined the subscription service&#039;s chances for success, or the ramifications for Microsoft should the strategy fail. &quot;A newly creative Microsoft is ready to roar,&quot; Fortune gushed. Too bad the same can&#039;t be said of the media.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/01_23/b3735001.htm&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft: How It Became Stronger Than Ever&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Business Week
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Beast Is Back&lt;br&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Fortune &amp;#91;June 11, 2001 issue&amp;#93;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1251">Media And Marketing</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2001 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Baldwin Louie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">89863 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
