<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Does Plagiarism Exist If You Can&amp;#039;t See It? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C27339%2C00.html</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Does Plagiarism Exist If You Can&#039;t See It?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Does Plagiarism Exist If You Can&#039;t See It?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C27339%2C00.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	It&#039;s copying, but with a twist. A Belgian ISP has sued Women.com, accusing it of pilfering its text and then running it invisibly on the Women.com site. The alleged heist is thought to be a ploy to bring more viewers to the women&#039;s site. Oops, we mean community. What, features like &quot;Worst Pickup Lines&quot; aren&#039;t working?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Media reports smirked at the news. According to the lawsuit (how many tech stories begin that way these days?), Euregio.net says Women.com violated its copyright by reprinting a paragraph from a horoscope site run by Euregio.net in white text on a white background. The invisible letters are detected by search engines, and thereby drive more traffic to Women.com, according to reporters. But the white-on-white look is so out these days, so for its trouble, Euregio wants $900,000 from iVillage, the new and no doubt proud owner of Women.com.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Salon&#039;s coverage included a digital try-this-at-home kit that let the curious use Google and its incriminating caching talents to see what Women.com has been accused of. Given that the text was invisible, Women.com apparently didn&#039;t bring its full editorial strengths to bear on it: According to Newsbytes, Euregio&#039;s suit says Women.com&#039;s reprint preserved the original spelling errors. And while cheaters tend to look pitiful (no wandering eyes, class), they also keep unseemly company. Salon noted that the cut-and- paste approach to content is &quot;a tack normally reserved for porn sites.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Women.com officials aren&#039;t helping. While the CEO is &quot;pursuing new interests&quot; as of Monday, the company&#039;s counsel was quoted by Salon as calling the lawsuit &quot;totally spurious, an outright attempt to blackmail and get money.&quot; The lawyer then suggested that perhaps the offending paragraph was the work of &quot;a hacker or sabotage.&quot; (She must have missed the new survey that indicated the greatest perceived threat to computer systems isn&#039;t from wily hackers but disgruntled insiders.) Perhaps there&#039;s a feature article here: &quot;10 Ways Not to Build Your Brand.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/tech/inbox/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cut-and-paste horoscope horror at Women.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Salon.com
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/19824.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Women.com sued over plagiarism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Register
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/167077.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Euregio.net Sues Women.com Over Horoscopes - Update&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Newsbytes.com
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.atnewyork.com/people/article/0,1471,8511_787321,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Women.com CEO Departs as iVillage Merger Closes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;AtNewYork.com
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1003-200-6334879.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Insiders More Threatening Than Hackers?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;CNET (Reuters)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1251">Media And Marketing</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2001 15:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Baldwin Louie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">89652 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
