<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Primedia Hopes to Avoid Hefty Payout From About.com Acquisition - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C28501%2C00.html</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Primedia Hopes to Avoid Hefty Payout From About.com Acquisition&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Primedia Hopes to Avoid Hefty Payout From About.com Acquisition</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/article/0%2C1902%2C28501%2C00.html</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;	Months after betting on Internet acquisition About.com and seeing its stock tumble, Primedia has made another bet: that the value of its shares will rebound in the next seven months, in time to cover a guaranteed payout to one of its executives.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the deal for About.com was reached in October, Primedia agreed to protect Scott Kurnit, About&#039;s CEO and now Primedia&#039;s chief Internet officer, from any negative financial repercussions by ensuring that Kurnit would receive at least $25 million for the remaining 1,429,344 shares of Primedia common stock he&#039;s allowed to sell this year. (The guarantee, which was contained in a clause in the acquisition agreement, is referred to as the &quot;Kurnit Shortfall Payment&quot; in a filing last week with the Securities and Exchange Commission.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Considering that the company&#039;s stock was trading at about $5.70 Monday afternoon, the shortfall would be nearly $17 million, and that would mean a big, embarrassing, unanticipated and unwanted expense this year for a company increasingly intent on short-term results.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Primedia has a hedge. The company, in effect, placed a bet with an undisclosed &quot;financial institution&quot; that will buy Kurnit&#039;s shares at the guaranteed minimum price. That institution will then either sell those shares on Feb. 28, 2002 — the first anniversary of the Primedia/About merger&#039;s closing — or another, earlier, date approved by Primedia.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wager is this: If Primedia&#039;s stock price hasn&#039;t risen far enough to make those shares worth $26.8 million — Kurnit&#039;s guaranteed payout plus the fee to the institution — then Primedia makes up the difference. With its stock price currently so low, the thinking must be that there&#039;s only one direction it can go. (Primedia owns 49 percent of Inside.com&#039;s parent company, Brill Media Holdings.)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kurnit received roughly 2.3 shares of Primedia stock for 1 of About.com&#039;s as part of the merger, turning the largest shareholder of About stock into the second-largest among Primedia&#039;s officers. At the time of the merger&#039;s closing, Kurnit owned 5,259,178 shares, plus options and restricted shares. Apparently to prevent Kurnit from dumping his stock on the open market and further depressing the company&#039;s stock price, Primedia had it written into his contract at the start of the merger that he could sell only a third of his new Primedia holdings before the first anniversary of the merger&#039;s closing. The 1.4 million he&#039;s selling to the unnamed financial institution — plus 210,000 shares sold in May that are not part of this hedge move — constitute this year&#039;s quota.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The quid pro quo was, we used an assumed price in the arrangement of $15.25 per share,&quot; explains Beverly Chell, Primedia&#039;s vice chairman and general counsel, referring to the price Primedia traded at on the day the merger was announced. &quot;We promised him that for the shares he sold — the one-third in the first year — if he didn&#039;t sell &amp;#91;at $15.25&amp;#93; we would make up the difference. That&#039;s the shortfall. What we&#039;ve got now is a financial institution to do a hedge. We believe the stock will be higher next February. We&#039;re betting if the financial institution pays him now, and we pay them in February, we&#039;re going to save money.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Asked if the hedge would delay the expense into next year, instead of having the Kurnit payout show up now, risking a hefty charge this quarter, Chell says: &quot;No, no, not at all.&quot; She adds, &quot;The only thing that would be booked is &amp;#91;the $1.8 million&amp;#93; fee. The rest was taken care of as part of the merger — it&#039;s all goodwill.&quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kurnit says he&#039;s looking to sell now because, &quot;I have a right to do it only in the first year. Five months into the deal as a board member, I&#039;m locked up. As an insider, when you get the chance to sell, you almost need to.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1252">Money And Markets</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2001 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Baldwin Louie</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">88752 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
