<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com." xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Prankster admits faking Google Chrome OS screenshots - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2009/07/09/prankster-admits-faking-google-chrome-os-screenshots</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Prankster admits faking Google Chrome OS screenshots&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Prankster admits faking Google Chrome OS screenshots</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2009/07/09/prankster-admits-faking-google-chrome-os-screenshots</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;File this under: Don&#039;t believe everything you see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The anonymous blogger who earlier today posted &quot;screenshots&quot; of an early build of Google&#039;s Chrome OS has admitted he faked the images.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before he confessed, however, numerous blogs and Web sites -- from Engadget to Neowin.net -- took the bait and accepted the screenshots as legitimate. Computerworld blogger &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.computerworld.com/chrome_os_first_leaked_pictures_and_specs&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Seth Weintraub&lt;/a&gt; was also duped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The screenshots were accompanied by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://chromeosleak.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/the-first-pics-of-the-chrome-os-beta-for-devs/#comments&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;backstory&lt;/a&gt; in which the blogger said he worked for a company that supplied parts for Acer, and had witnessed a demo of an early version of Chrome OS, the Linux-based operating system that Google announced yesterday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;I was the last to leave the room and the Google Rep seemed to forget his privacy,&quot; the blogger wrote. &quot;I happened to have my Mini-Cam with me and took these medium quality shots. I am sorry I couldn&#039;t get better. They were all taken in less than 10 seconds. Adrenaline was rushing like crazy.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost immediately, some readers called out the images as phony. &quot;If these shots were real, and you really were putting your job on the line, you wouldn&#039;t say &#039;I was the last to leave the room,&#039;&quot; pointed out a commenter named, appropriately enough, &quot;fake,&quot; in a message posted about three hours later. &quot;It wouldn&#039;t be that hard to figure out who you are, would it? What&#039;s more, which Google rep demos a new OS on a kitchen bench?&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The prankster, who has not revealed his name, &lt;a href=&quot;http://chromeosleak.wordpress.com/2009/07/09/17/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;came clean&lt;/a&gt; about eight hours after his original post. &quot;I am sorry if you beleived [sic] it. It was a really bad attempt. You all are smart people. I never planned on it getting this big. But it did,&quot; the blogger wrote. He included a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4uDQJoK12p8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;video clip&lt;/a&gt; that illustrated how he created the bogus screenshots.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With interest in Chrome OS off the charts, it&#039;s not surprising that bloggers, reporters and users were fooled into thinking that the images were legitimate. News of the operating system, which some have said poses a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135288/Google_s_Chrome_OS_poses_long_term_threat_to_Microsoft&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;long-term threat to Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9135295/Chrome_OS_will_push_Apple_to_address_failings_say_analysts_&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;not necessarily to Apple&lt;/a&gt;, was featured prominently yesterday on sites that generally don&#039;t follow technology news closely.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com./news/2009/07/09/prankster-admits-faking-google-chrome-os-screenshots#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/1571">Application development</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/1531">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/1556">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/1520">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 14:17:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">137127 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
