<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Windows 7 Upgrades: Why 25-Free Deal Stinks - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/01/windows-7-upgrades-why-25-free-deal-stinks</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Windows 7 Upgrades: Why 25-Free Deal Stinks&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Windows 7 Upgrades: Why 25-Free Deal Stinks</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/01/windows-7-upgrades-why-25-free-deal-stinks</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On one hand, Microsoft may seem generous for allowing companies to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cio.com/article/488624&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;upgrade 25 purchased machines to Windows 7&lt;/a&gt; for free between now and the Oct. 22 planned ship date for the new OS. After all, that&#039;s five times the amount of free licenses that it offered companies for Vista upgrades three years ago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But that was a different time, a better economy. These days, the 25 PCs gesture is not enough.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not enough, because Vista was a debacle for early adopters. Vista didn&#039;t deliver on its promises and caused businesses stress and anxiety, forcing many to make do with the more solid, albeit aging, Windows XP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although I think there&#039;s too many &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/storage/?p=521&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;rants out there on the Web&lt;/a&gt; now about how all the long-suffering Vista users should get Windows 7 for free forever, heck, with a new car thrown in, I do think businesses are owed better and cheaper access to Windows 7 because of Vista&#039;s failure in the enterprise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I also think the 25-PC limit should not be tolerated because of our crippling economic downturn and because it&#039;s a sneaky tactic by Microsoft to get companies to pay up for a Software Assurance agreement, which costs $100 - $150 per machine for unlimited upgrades at no additional cost for three years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft kept the 25-PC limit in very fine print when it announced its &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cio.com/article/496096/Microsoft_Launches_Free_Windows_Upgrade_Deal&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;free Windows 7 Upgrade Option plan&lt;/a&gt; last week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Only the smallest of companies will not be affected by the PC limit; companies that need to buy, say 100 PCs right now, will have to pay for Windows twice (Vista initially and then the license for Windows 7 when it releases) for 75 of them. As PCWorld&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cio.com/article/496208&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;David Coursey asks&lt;/a&gt;: Why pay now and pay later?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are companies&#039; other options? You can wait until Oct. 22 to buy new machines with Windows 7 pre-loaded, though being forced to wait to make needed purchase in a recession is lame. Companies could spend extra money on a Software Assurance agreement and then buy however many machines they want and get free upgrades (that&#039;s what Microsoft wants).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or, companies could fight the system, using PC makers as allies (what Microsoft most definitely does not want).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gartner.com/DisplayDocument?ref=g_search&amp;amp;id=1045012&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; titled &quot;Enterprises Should Demand Windows Upgrade Option&quot;, Gartner research director Michael Silver &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cio.com/article/496333&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;slams Microsoft&#039;s 25-PC Windows 7 upgrade limit&lt;/a&gt;, emphasizing that businesses still have the right to bypass Microsoft and negotiate with PC makers that have leverage in this area.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Silver writes: &quot;Press your OEM to give you free Windows 7 upgrades for all the PCs you buy until Windows 7 ships on new PCs. Larger OEMs administer their own programs, have latitude to do this and have made exceptions for organizations in the past.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If your OEM can&#039;t save the day, then Silver suggests buying 25 PCs now and then buying the rest with Windows 7 preloaded after Oct. 22. It&#039;s not ideal, but you won&#039;t be duped into paying twice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But businesses should first try nagging the heck out of OEMs for more PCs with free Windows 7 upgrades. If OEMs have the right to push their own programs, you might as well push your own interests.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Are you a Tweeter? Follow me on Twitter at twitter.com/smoneill. Follow everything from CIO.com on Twitter at twitter.com/CIOonline.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2009/07/01/windows-7-upgrades-why-25-free-deal-stinks#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1402">IDGNS</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1575">Infrastructure</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1556">Operating systems</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1520">Software</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1431">Windows</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3282">Windows 7</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:39:30 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">136755 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
