<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - iPhone HD or iPod Touch HD announced by Oct. 2009?  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;iPhone HD or iPod Touch HD announced by Oct. 2009? &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Judged negative. This was</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-13349</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judged negative. This was pretty much over after the iPod event last month had no HD news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 10:07:04 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13349 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Zune HD gets a rave</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-12794</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Zune HD gets a rave review from CNet:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-12519_7-10303243-49.html&quot; title=&quot;http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-12519_7-10303243-49.html&quot;&gt;http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-12519_7-10303243-49.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Will this be something that pushes Apple to move more quickly on HD for its portable devices? Or is the Zune market share still so small that Apple can afford to go by its own pace?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 09:58:03 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12794 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The S5PC100 in iPhone 3GS</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-12463</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.samsung.com/global/business/semiconductor/support/brochures/downloads/systemlsi/s5pc100_brochure_200902.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;S5PC100&lt;/a&gt; in iPhone 3GS with enhanced graphic chip makes iPhone 3GS capable of handling HD video.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:08:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12463 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This dropped very sharply</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-12343</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;This dropped very sharply today -- 25%. Some people were hoping for a WWDC announcement which never happened. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 11:12:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12343 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When we say &quot;HD,&quot; are we</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10084</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;When we say &quot;HD,&quot; are we talking 720p or higher as with televisions? Or is there some different standard for mobile devices? According to Apple, the resolution of the current iPhone is 480 x 320 at 16ppi. In order for this prediction to be judged favorably, must the screen leapfrog 640 x 480 and 800 x 600 and jump right to 1024 x 768 (or close to it?)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think we need some kind of number, unless any increase in resolution will qualify as &quot;HD&quot; enough for this prediction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 15:53:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jesse Janowiak</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10084 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I have several Ipods that I</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10046</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I have several Ipods that I use daily, but would like to see bluetooth added so I would not have to use the adaptor with the Jabra and Motorola.  Wireless is great.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 21:12:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Gary Geagan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10046 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Lev, to some extent, I</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10041</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Lev, to some extent, I agree with you. The smaller the screen is, the less discernible content resolution is (due to human limitation). Still, my suspicion is that iPhone 3G 2nd generation will be markedly improved than its first generation (perhaps, multi-core, better graphics chip, better resolution, etc). It is natural for Apple to step it up a notch each time it ups a product generation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 17:21:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10041 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@David, still, I don&#039;t see</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10037</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@David, still, I don&#039;t see the point of embedding High Definition into such small hand-held devices as iPhones. The pixel per inch count is high as it is. What I&#039;m saying is that to pack a few more pixels into an already small screen, thus making it HD, in my opinion, would be pointless. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In your post, you talk about the difference btw YouTube Video vs. YouTube HD Video, and there is one. But you and I know that HD videos on YouTube are not really HD, right? They are named that way so that we could differentiate between them. The question is whether you would see the difference btw the current high quality video and the HD video on an HTC Touch (when and if it is released). I doubt that you will, at least not with a naked eye.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as the PowerVR chip goes (and thanks for the article), impressive! HD is not required for the chip to work, though, right?  However it does seam like it would open doors for better gaming experience on hand-helds. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What I&#039;m saying is that such a small incremental improvement in the quality of video is not worth the &quot;HD&quot; suffix.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 12:42:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lev Danilov</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10037 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is the point of HTC</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10024</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;What is the point of HTC Touch and HTC Touch HD? Bottom line, better graphics processor and even better resolution (pixel count)? Even I can see the difference of YouTube video in HD vs non-HD in a tiny video frame. See this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/01/09/new_powervr_chip_may_give_apples_future_iphone_hd_opencl.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article&lt;/a&gt; about the PowerVR chip that would enable HD capability on the iPhone and iPod Touch. Bottom line, video content is going HD and the 3rd screen (mobile devices)  will follow the same path as the 1st (PC display) and 2nd screen (HDTV).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 21:35:13 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10024 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I doubt there is any</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10022</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I doubt there is any noticeable difference btw HD and non-HD video on an iPhone/iPod. What&#039;s the point?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:35:10 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Lev Danilov</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10022 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>this sounds like a good idea</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comment-10018</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;this sounds like a good idea but they could easily add hd in a software update&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:39:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kyle calvo</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10018 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>iPhone HD or iPod Touch HD announced by Oct. 2009? </title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Recently, Apple&#039;s iTunes 8 was launched with support for high-definition content. The current models of the iPhone and iPod Touch do not support viewing HD content. Apple watchers &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theiphoneblog.com/2008/10/23/iphone-hd-speculation-increasing/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;anticipate a new iPhone&lt;/a&gt; with more storage space and increased processing power that will support HD.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Prediction:&lt;/b&gt; Apple announces iPhone HD or iPod Touch HD by September 30, 2009. For a favorable judgment, an HD-supported iPhone or iPod Touch need not be available at the time of the announcement. Let the community decide and place your bets!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Image: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/bendodson/&quot;&gt;Ben Dodson&lt;/a&gt;/Flickr  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/iphone-hd-or-ipod-touch-hd-available-oct-2009-0#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2795">Blackberry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2499">Cell Phones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3806">co: apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/11774">G1</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5662">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5886">HD</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7476">iPhone 3G</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2567">iTunes</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/14187">palm pre</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/13111">product: iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/13531">product: ipod touch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3968">RIM</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:51:42 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">125951 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
