<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Apple files Palm Pre lawsuit? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Apple files Palm Pre lawsuit?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Judged negative -- no sign</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-13430</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Judged negative -- no sign of lawsuit. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ilamont&quot;&gt;twitter.com/ilamont&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 09:00:37 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 13430 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is very true of what</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-11594</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;This is very true of what you are saying but, i believe that palm would have had to of acted within a year and a half or so of the release date of the iphone in legal terms of statute of limitations.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:19:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Alex Cerros</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 11594 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple is running scared</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-10192</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Apple is running scared because Palm already has cut and paste implemented.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:13:18 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kahn</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10192 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I thought Jefferson Y. Han</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-10190</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I thought Jefferson Y. Han debuted his initial multi-touch system at the TED conference way before the iphone?  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Table-cum-touch_display.jpg&quot; title=&quot;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Table-cum-touch_display.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/19/Table-cum-touch_displ...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:58:40 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Victor Noda</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10190 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Yi-Wyn, exactly why my</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-9844</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Yi-Wyn, exactly why my proposed prediction was generic (i.e. Apple can go after ANYONE they feel is infringing on their newly granted Touch IP asset).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 14:20:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9844 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Global Crown Capital&#039;s</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-9840</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Global Crown Capital&#039;s wireless analyst Pablo Perez-Fernandez wrote a note to clients that if Apple files suit against Palm, Apple can also go after HTC, Garmin, and Research in Motion which all use some form of the multi-touch interface. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28978246&quot; title=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28978246&quot;&gt;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28978246&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 12:44:38 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yi-Wyn Yen167771</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9840 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>There are rumors that Apple</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-9763</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;There are rumors that Apple WDC may have some news about iPhone and iPod Touch which occurs around June. Latest rumored release for Palm Pre is in June. It is normal for lawsuits to be used as strategic tools in a competitive environment. Apple may seek to file to wreck havoc on Palm Pre launch  plans (or at least be a distraction). An injunction prior or immediately after the launch will do the trick. The prediction does not require a settlement or judgment on filed lawsuit. The fact that Apple files one is sufficient for favorable judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, I am of the opinion that at the end of the day, a cross licensing agreement will happen which makes the lawsuit go away.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:13:58 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9763 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Palm and Apple will come to</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-9761</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Palm and Apple will come to an agreement without any lawsuit because Palm also has many patents that Apple infringes upon.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Take #7,268,775, entitled &quot;Dynamic brightness range for portable computer displays based on ambient conditions,&quot; for example -- it covers automatically adjusting display brightness using an ambient light sensor while leaving a user-selected brightness setting alone. Yep, that&#039;s exactly how the iPhone does it:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or how about #7,007,239, &quot;Method and apparatus for accessing a contacts database and telephone services&quot;? Claim 10 is an almost exact description of the iPhone&#039;s phone app -- buttons for dialing, call history, contacts, and speed dial that stay on-screen as you toggle between them:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Or how about #7,296,107, &quot;System and method for detection of an accessory device connection status&quot;? It covers leaving the display at full brightness instead of auto-dimming while connected to a power source during sync -- go ahead and try it, iPhone owners, that&#039;s what it does. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And let&#039;s not forget 2001&#039;s greatest hit, patent #7,231,208, &quot;User interface-technique for managing an active call&quot;: it describes in detail a conference call management system that&#039;s exactly like the iPhone&#039;s -- you put one call on hold while you make another, and then you can independently manage each call from a single screen. Look familiar?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are just some of the Palm patents they can use as bargaining chips with Apple if necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:33:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Pandaman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9761 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Garrick, Darn! I submitted</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comment-9716</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Garrick, Darn! I submitted a &lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/apple-files-infringement-lawsuit-related-its-touch-intellectual-property&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;suggestion related to this a couple of days ago&lt;/a&gt; (but more generic, not solely a filing against Palm). I think modifying the prediction to be more generic (e.g. lawsuits can be made against any device manufacturer such as HTC, Palm, Samsung, etc) makes for a more exciting prediction in play. Each device manufacturer has their own IP asset up their sleeves to use as bargaining leverage (that could result in cross IP licensing to a certain extent). So, winning or losing a lawsuit would be more difficult to ascertain.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:44:52 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9716 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple files Palm Pre lawsuit?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2009/01/08/ces-palm-shows-its-palm-pre-gesture-based-smart-phone&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently unveiled Palm Pre&lt;/a&gt; won early praise for a  &lt;a href=&quot;http://i.gizmodo.com/5133554/palm-pre-the-definitive-faq?skyline=true&amp;amp;s=x&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; number of innovations.&lt;/a&gt; However, the Pre&#039;s similarities to the Apple iPhone have not gone unnoticed, and Palm has raised questions that the company may have infringed on Apple&#039;s patents.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple COO Tim Cook took &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2009/1/will-apple-sue-palms-pants-off&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a swipe at Palm indirectly&lt;/a&gt; during the latest earnings call: &amp;quot;We like competition as long as they don&#039;t rip off our IP,&amp;quot; or its intellectual property with multi-touch technology. &amp;quot;And if they do, we&#039;re going to go after anybody that does.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palm&#039;s response: &lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/news/2009/01/23/palm-will-defend-its-ip-too-confirms-former-apple-spokesperson&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Bring it&lt;/a&gt;. Said Palm spokesperson Lynn Fox to Digital Daily: &amp;quot;Palm has a long history of innovation that is reflected in our products and robust patent portfolio &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/patents?as_q=&amp;amp;num=10&amp;amp;btnG=Google+Search&amp;amp;as_epq=&amp;amp;as_oq=&amp;amp;as_eq=&amp;amp;as_pnum=&amp;amp;as_vt=&amp;amp;as_pinvent=&amp;amp;as_pasgnee=+Palm%2C+Inc.&amp;amp;as_pusc=&amp;amp;as_pintlc=&amp;amp;as_ptype=11&amp;amp;as_drrb_is=q&amp;amp;as_minm_is=1&amp;amp;as_miny_is=2009&amp;amp;as_maxm_is=1&amp;amp;as_maxy_is=2009&amp;amp;as_drrb_ap=q&amp;amp;as_minm_ap=1&amp;amp;as_miny_ap=2009&amp;amp;as_maxm_ap=1&amp;amp;as_maxy_ap=2009&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(31 pages of patents in Google Patent Search)&lt;/a&gt;... If faced with legal action, we are confident that we have the tools necessary to defend ourselves.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palm announced that the Pre will launch in the first half of 2009. If Apple decides to file a lawsuit it would probably do so not too long after the Pre&#039;s launch. Engadget conducted an Apple vs. Palm legal analysis &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.engadget.com/2009/01/28/apple-vs-palm-the-in-depth-analysis/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prediction: Apple will take some form of legal action (i.e., injunction, lawsuit) against Palm over the Pre by September 30, 2009. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Image: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.palm.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Palm &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-files-palm-pre-lawsuit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2795">Blackberry</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5993">co:Palm</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/758">iPhone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7476">iPhone 3G</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7171">iPod Touch</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5622">Lawsuits</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/14187">palm pre</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/3968">RIM</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5668">Standards &amp;amp; Legal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/14200">tim cook</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:14:30 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Garrick Hileman</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">125254 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
