<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com." xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Job loss rate rises to 8% or higher for January? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Job loss rate rises to 8% or higher for January?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>More on job loss</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-10020</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;More on job loss prediction:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/01/job-loss-prediction-2009-2010/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/01/job-loss-prediction-2009-2010/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/01/job-loss-prediction-2009-201...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:18:12 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>chleoku</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10020 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stepping in Jan 09, we have</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-10019</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Stepping in Jan 09, we have the highest layoff rate since 2002:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/02/january-2009-layoffs-highest-2002/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/02/january-2009-layoffs-highest-2002/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.wealthalchemist.com/Blog/2009/02/january-2009-layoffs-highest...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:17:04 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>WealthAlchemist</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10019 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looks like the numbers for</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-10000</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Looks like the numbers for January are posted - 7.6% unemployment rate in January. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf&quot; title=&quot;http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf&quot;&gt;http://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 08:58:34 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Melissa Chang</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 10000 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wow! Pelosi said 500M jobs</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9907</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Wow! &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8hMJVXt09E&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pelosi said 500M jobs loss every month&lt;/a&gt; DOH!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 11:40:19 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9907 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Today, ADP reported decrease</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9906</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Today, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adpemploymentreport.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ADP reported decrease of 522,000&lt;/a&gt;. Nonfarm payroll now stands at 112,702,000. The decrease represents under 0.5% (522K/112,702K). It is now a given (99%+) that the rate will not hit or break 8% for January.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:01:42 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9906 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Current consensus for the</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9881</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Current consensus for the Jan &#039;09 unemployment rate is 7.5%&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 13:42:24 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9881 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>According to this, consensus</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9850</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fxstreet.com/fundamental/economic-calendar/?id=eba27e92-c938-46ed-97d1-d9729c6d6d33&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, consensus of ADP Employment Change for Jan &#039;09 is showing a -525K (relative to -693K in Dec &#039;08). This is a precursor to the LBO reported metric. If the consensus is on track, then the unemployment rate increase should be less than 0.5% (which would put the rate under 8%).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:23:41 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9850 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I agree with David on when</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9781</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;I agree with David on when this should be judged. The numbers I provided were the initial numbers that come out at the start of the month vs. the revised ones from the Labor Dept.. I&#039;m assuming people are betting on the stats I&#039;ve used, so it wouldn&#039;t be fair to change it midway.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:58:05 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yi-Wyn Yen167771</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9781 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Latest jobless claims</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9762</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Latest jobless claims numbers came in at around 588,000 which is far from the 800,000 needed to bump unemployment to 8%&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:51:23 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9762 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>URL:</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9603</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;URL: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abcnews.go.com/Business/CEOProfiles/story?id=6731375&amp;amp;page=1&quot; title=&quot;http://www.abcnews.go.com/Business/CEOProfiles/story?id=6731375&amp;amp;page=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.abcnews.go.com/Business/CEOProfiles/story?id=6731375&amp;amp;page=1&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:45:49 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Curran</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9603 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Miserable Monday: More Than</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9602</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;cite&gt;&lt;em&gt;Miserable Monday: More Than 40,000 Layoffs &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Major Companies From Communications to Retail, More Americans Lose Jobs &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/cite&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Again, as already noted by David, it&#039;s the timing of the actual layoffs&lt;br /&gt;
which occur in January which actually matters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;/John&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 19:45:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>John Curran</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9602 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Yi-Wyn. there are numerous</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9522</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Yi-Wyn. there are numerous announcements of layoffs in the news but as far as this prediction is concerned, the ones that matters are the ones occurring in January 2009. Most layoffs occurs in phases over time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:33:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9522 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Garrick, IMO, I believe</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9521</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Garrick, IMO, I believe that the prediction should be judged on the initial of January number (on February). Any revisions comes in March or later should matter not. Otherwise, bets would be frozen until March unnecessarily.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:31:39 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9521 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Labor Department often</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9468</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;The Labor Department often revises the actual unemployment rate after they release their initial figure, so we need to watch this during judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:21:57 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Garrick Hileman932530</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9468 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A sobering look at job</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comment-9443</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;A sobering look at job losses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Layoffs Keep Growing—Is Your Firm On the List?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28750173&quot; title=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28750173&quot;&gt;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28750173&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:12:31 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yi-Wyn Yen167771</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 9443 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Job loss rate rises to 8% or higher for January?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Judgment made on February 6, 2009: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;amp;sid=a7jpCSt.gQoM&amp;amp;refer=home&quot;&gt;Unemployment rose 7.6%&lt;/a&gt; for January. The prediction was wrong (thankfully), and the majority of the TIS community got this right. -- The Industry Standard &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original prediction:&lt;/b&gt; The unemployment rate rose to 7.2% for December with 524,000 jobs lost, the highest in 15 years. Total job losses in 2008 r&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnbc.com//id/28575711&quot;&gt;eached 2.6 million&lt;/a&gt;, the most since 1945 when 2.8 million were out of jobs at the end of World War II. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here&#039;s a look at the &lt;b&gt;monthly unemployment rate&lt;/b&gt; in the U.S. since the financial crisis started unraveling in September:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;September 2008   6.1%   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;October 2008        6.5%&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;November 2008    6.7% &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;December 2008    7.2%&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Analysts say the U.S. is on track &lt;a href=&quot;http://money.cnn.com/2009/01/09/news/economy/jobs_december/index.htm&quot;&gt;to reach a 10% unemployment rate&lt;/a&gt; this year. The Labor Dept. is expected to report January data within the first week of February.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prediction: As companies report quarterly earnings this month, expect more layoffs to happen and the January unemployment rate jump to 8%. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/job-losses-rise-8-or-more-month-january#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/12977">co: Labor Dept.</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/12976">job losses</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/8934">Unemployment</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:25:21 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Yi-Wyn Yen</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">124004 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
