<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com." xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - New Cuil search engine ceases operations by July 2009? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New Cuil search engine ceases operations by July 2009?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Sorry David. I thought I did</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009#comment-12766</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sorry David. I thought I did judge this one. Putting it through now ...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 13:35:15 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12766 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why the delay in judging</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009#comment-12762</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Why the delay in judging this?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:09:44 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12762 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cuil is still operational.</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009#comment-12344</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cuil is still operational. An SEO pro reviewed it yesterday, and said that while the results have improved, there are still some bad pages showing up:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/cuil-meets-wolfram-alpha-gives-birth-to-google-on-crack/10920/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/cuil-meets-wolfram-alpha-gives-birth-to-google-on-crack/10920/&quot;&gt;http://www.searchenginejournal.com/cuil-meets-wolfram-alpha-gives-birth-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, Bing continues to gain on Google:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10260490-56.html&quot; title=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10260490-56.html&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13860_3-10260490-56.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ian Lamont&lt;br /&gt;
Managing Editor&lt;br /&gt;
The Industry Standard&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/the_standard&quot;&gt;twitter.com/the_standard&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 13:43:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 12344 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cuil had $33M in 2 rounds of</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009#comment-5767</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Cuil had $33M in 2 rounds of VC funding and has only spent $7M at launch. 3rd round financing might not be as easy given its launch debacle. However, remaining $26M can easily afford Cuil to stay afloat and in operation beyond July 2009 since  the business is not a capital intensive one&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://seekingalpha.com/article/87581-cuil-s-not-a-story-but-26-million-on-marketing-might-be-one&quot; title=&quot;http://seekingalpha.com/article/87581-cuil-s-not-a-story-but-26-million-on-marketing-might-be-one&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://seekingalpha.com/article/87581-cuil-s-not-a-story-but-26-million-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 13:22:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5767 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New Cuil search engine ceases operations by July 2009?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With former &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/28/cuil-stumbles-out-gate?page=0%2C0&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google engineers&lt;/a&gt; at the helm, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cuil.com&quot; title=&quot;Cuil search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cuil&lt;/a&gt; had an incredibly high profile launch amidst great hype (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/cuil_publicity.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;props to the PR firm&lt;/a&gt;). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost immediately after launch,  however, Cuil experienced server &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/28/cuil-stumbles-out-gate?page=0%2C1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;performance and availability problems&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When service was finally restored, Cuil &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/28/review-out-gate-cuil-ambitious-flawed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;suffered&lt;/a&gt; the worst &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;criticisms&lt;/a&gt; of all - the usability and relevancy of the search results were well below expectations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One month after the launch, Cuil&#039;s VP of Product quietly &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/09/11/cuils-vp-product-bails-out-a-month-after-launch/&quot; title=&quot;Cuil VP Product&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;stepped down&lt;/a&gt; to a consulting role. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketshare.hitslink.com/report.aspx?sample=18&amp;amp;qprid=38&amp;amp;qpcustom=Cuil&amp;amp;qpsp=3497&amp;amp;qpnp=34&amp;amp;qptimeframe=D&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;reported by Net Applications&lt;/a&gt;, Cuil traffic has now dwindled to near-zero usage. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Prediction: Cuil will cease operations by end of June 2009. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judgement can be made earlier with a formal announcement made by Cuil or the mainstream media. Otherwise, judgment will occur July 1, 2009.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com./predictions/new-cuil-search-engine-ceases-operations-july-2009#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com./taxonomy/term/778">co:google</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:35:52 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">114690 at http://www.thestandard.com.</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
