<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Picture This: YouTube spam  - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/09/picture-youtube-spam</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Picture This: YouTube spam &quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>It is easy to work out if</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/09/picture-youtube-spam#comment-5525</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;It is easy to work out if sock puppets accounts are used, there is a flood of comments from many different users with all the same or similar user profiles. Things such as the sign up date, country of origin, and favourites are nearly always the same. Also they never have any videos uploaded. Common spammer names include a random name lifted from somewhere and a random number. Also comments don&#039;t always make sense as they are copied from other similar YouTube videos.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:58:50 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5525 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Picture This: YouTube spam </title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/09/picture-youtube-spam</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/09/08/youtube-slammed-dmcas-over-anti-scientology-content&quot;&gt;Bogus DMCA notices&lt;/a&gt; aren&#039;t the only problem that YouTube has to deal with. Spam is an increasingly visible irritant on the video-sharing site. Today, one of the &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/browse?s=md&amp;amp;c=0&amp;amp;l=&amp;amp;b=0&quot;&gt;most discussed&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; videos is &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://tinyurl.com/6e463x&quot;&gt;How Viagara is working&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;quot; Despite being viewed just 2,555 times, it already has 1,051 comments and 1,069 ratings. This makes it the #9 &amp;quot;Top Rated&amp;quot; video and #11 &amp;quot;Most Discussed&amp;quot; video for today, which puts it on several highly trafficked pages and RSS lists on YouTube. A high comment:view ratio is one way to get on these coveted lists, which helps generate even more traffic and commentary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The video won&#039;t be winning any awards for comedic brilliance, but the person who posted it -- &amp;quot;ojehemeka,&amp;quot; who only joined yesterday -- could care less. It&#039;s all about money. He or she apparently &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coolbuddy.com/videos/video_clip.asp?id=111&quot;&gt;scraped the video from Coolbuddy.com&lt;/a&gt;, slapped an advertisement and a link for an illicit international pill site on the YouTube description, and somehow convinced about two out of every five viewers to actually leave a comment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judging by the 99 related videos on YouTube -- mostly about Cialis and Viagara -- it&#039;s quite clear that pill merchants have taken over a small chunk of YouTube. Last month, &lt;i&gt;The Standard&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/08/04/want-get-your-video-top-youtube-charts-follow-recipe-maybe&quot;&gt;pointed to several supposed tactics that spammers and scammers use to manipulate YouTube rankings&lt;/a&gt; for fun and profit. The source -- an Encyclopedia Dramatica article -- also described &amp;quot;comment flooding&amp;quot; techniques, using sock puppet accounts, but &lt;i&gt;The Standard&lt;/i&gt; was unable to determine if that&#039;s what&#039;s going on with this video, as many comments appear to be from legitimate users.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u158/090908_youtube_spam.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;YouTube spam&quot; height=&quot;225&quot; width=&quot;605&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/09/09/picture-youtube-spam#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/778">co:google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5450">Picture This</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5748">product:youtube</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1967">Spam</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:39:46 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">113191 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
