<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Apple to recall 3G iPhone in 2008? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Apple to recall 3G iPhone in 2008?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>i just returned mine - too</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-5376</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;i just returned mine - too many problems. great gadget if it works. 3g is a farce imo. it just doesn&#039;t work. i went through two 3g phones. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;they need to go back to the chrome backing - heard plastic backings are cracking.&lt;br /&gt;
they rolled this out way too fast. class action suits will grow in number imo&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:47:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>drew gotts</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5376 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Eric: I wouldn&#039;t worry</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-5010</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Eric: I wouldn&#039;t worry about the people that drift in and don&#039;t see this portion of the site for what it is.  Certainly not enough to change what you&#039;ve got here now.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:55:16 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5010 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Eric, I would have</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4995</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Eric, I would have rewritten the suggestion if it was gonna become a playable bet (upon request).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 10:58:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4995 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@David, it wasn&#039;t accepted</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4989</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;@David, it wasn&#039;t accepted because it was a word-for-word lift from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wireless-weblog.com/50226711/apple_to_recall_the_iphone_3g.php&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;, other than the prediction paragraph at the end.  It was an excellent idea, but we can&#039;t publish entire articles - without proper citations - and use them as our own (or yours).  &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill113600</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4989 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Don - this isn&#039;t an</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4988</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;@Don - this isn&#039;t an article.  It&#039;s a prediction.  You place a bet on it, and the community consensus (which is correct over 85% of the time) predicts the outcome.  @TheStandardCommunity, this is something we see from time to time.  People come in and simply don&#039;t recognize the prediction market for what it is.  Part of that is because, in general, prediction markets are still relatively unknown by the masses.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would it have helped if I put &quot;Prediction:&quot; in front of every prediction headline?  Probably not.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What if we sent you to a completely separate site, disconnected from the news and other information The Standard has to offer?  In my view, that&#039;s a poor user experience.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What if we didn&#039;t make predictions have very much content at all?  Just a question, and the rules.  No back story.  Perhaps.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:50:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill113600</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4988 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.macnn.com/articles</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4974</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.macnn.com/articles/08/08/22/apple.adds.iphone.tam/&quot; title=&quot;http://www.macnn.com/articles/08/08/22/apple.adds.iphone.tam/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.macnn.com/articles/08/08/22/apple.adds.iphone.tam/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:31:59 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Don</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4974 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.youtube.com/watch?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4973</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsmMgu-h31A&quot; title=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsmMgu-h31A&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SsmMgu-h31A&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:22:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Your Fathers Oldsmobile</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4973 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Eric, did my suggestion on</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4970</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Eric, did my suggestion on 8/21/08 (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/iphone-3g-recall-announced&quot; title=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/iphone-3g-recall-announced&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/suggestions/iphone-3g-recall-anno...&lt;/a&gt;) not accepted?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:30:20 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4970 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Perhaps because it&#039;s not</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4968</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Perhaps because it&#039;s not intended as a news article?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:25:27 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4968 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I&#039;m trying really hard to</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comment-4967</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I&#039;m trying really hard to find one new bit of information in your just released article that has not already been reported a week ago.  I can&#039;t , can you yourself?  One lazy ass writer.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:09:03 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Don P.</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4967 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Apple to recall 3G iPhone in 2008?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Judgment on January 5, 2008:&lt;/b&gt;  This did not occur by the end of 2008, which the community correctly predicted.  -- The Industry Standard &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original prediction:&lt;/b&gt;  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nomura analyst Richard Windsor &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marketwatch.com/News/Story/Story.aspx?guid={A660CD8F-3C9B-4203-A22A-9D812D7ED443}&amp;amp;siteid=yhoof2&quot;&gt;said in a note to his clients&lt;/a&gt; that an “immature chipset solution and radio protocol stack” from Infineon Technologies AG may be the source of reported connection problems with Apple&#039;s 3G iPhone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Could the new and much-hyped 3G iPhone be seriously ill? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; “Two well-placed sources tell BusinessWeek.com the glitches are related to a chip inside Apple&#039;s music-playing cell phone. The sources add that Apple (AAPL) plans to remedy the problems through a software upgrade rather than through a more disruptive step, such as a product recall,” Peter Burrows at BusinessWeek &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2008/tc20080813_430402.htm&quot;&gt;reports&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Burrows continues, “One source says the problem lies squarely with Infineon&#039;s technology, which is fairly new and untested in high volumes outside a lab setting. Not only is the iPhone shipping in much higher volumes than other handsets, it&#039;s also gobbling up far more 3G minutes as owners use it to surf the Web, watch YouTube (GOOG) videos, and utilize other bandwidth-hogging services.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, the inevitable fingerpointing continues as Infineon &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2008/tc20080813_430402.htm&quot;&gt;denies&lt;/a&gt; their chipset is to blame.  A company spokesman said, “...the chips haven&#039;t resulted in comparable problems in other phones, including those made by Samsung.” &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Usually Apple won’t lift a finger until disgruntled customers file a class-action lawsuit.  That line &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/08/22/lawsuit-alleges-false-advertising-iphone-3g&quot;&gt;has now been crossed&lt;/a&gt;.  Although the new iPhone has &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/08/26/iphone-3g-takes-just-weeks-outsell-original-iphone&quot;&gt;already outsold the original&lt;/a&gt; in a matter of weeks; the din of complaints could continue to rise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Prediction:&lt;/b&gt; Will Apple need to recall the 3G iPhone in 2008 due to chipset problems?  Let the community decide.  Judgment will be made when Apple announces a formal recall for affected 3G handsets in 2008, or by the end of the year, whichever comes first.  If a software release &amp;quot;fixes&amp;quot; the problem to the satisfaction of the mainstream media, judgment against the prediciton will occur early.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;(Photo credit: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.flickr.com/photos/alykat/&quot; title=&quot;Link to alykat&#039;s photostream&quot;&gt;alykat&lt;/a&gt;) &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/apple-recall-3g-iphone-2008#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1620">3G</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/977">co:Apple</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5665">Mobile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5755">product:iphone</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/7477">recall</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:14:25 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112210 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
