<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Net Views: Sock puppet tactics on Wikipedia - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/net-views-sock-puppet-tactics-wikipedia</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Net Views: Sock puppet tactics on Wikipedia&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Net Views: Sock puppet tactics on Wikipedia</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/net-views-sock-puppet-tactics-wikipedia</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&amp;quot;... Use a closed proxy and run a real sock. This requires a good deal of discipline. Generally, for n=2 socks, editing one with IE and the other with Firefox is a good idea, with one or the other running through the proxy. If they&#039;re on two different computers (a desktop and a laptop), even better. Don&#039;t have the two socks ever edit the same articles, vote in the same AFDs, or anything else.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;Finally, if you&#039;re not infected by edit-count-itis, then I would also suggest abandoning the sock every 3-6 months and starting a new one, from a new proxy.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;If you don&#039;t have access to a closed proxy, then I would be very careful about socking for any reason.&amp;quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;– &amp;quot;Gomi,&amp;quot; The Wikipedia Review, &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=19497&quot;&gt;The correct way to sock&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/people/net-views&quot;&gt;More Net Views&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/17/more-techmeme-analysis-15-sources-account-more-70-headlines&quot;&gt;Techmeme analysis, part II: 15% of sources account for more than 70% of headlines &lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/real-problem-googles-blogger-service-neglect&quot;&gt;The real problem with Google&#039;s Blogger service: Neglect&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/net-views-sock-puppet-tactics-wikipedia#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5843">product:wikipedia</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:12:47 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Net Views</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110754 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
