<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Picture This: Kuil, ciul, or just &amp;quot;cuil sucks&amp;quot;? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Picture This: Kuil, ciul, or just &quot;cuil sucks&quot;?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Cuil you guys suck ! Dont</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-5455</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Cuil you guys suck ! Dont ever advertise something thats not ready yet ! I am never coming back to your site !&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 00:28:40 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ass</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5455 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>cuil suiks 
I searched for</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-4549</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;cuil suiks &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I searched for alltel and it had an image of tmobile as their first result...  also they page was layed out funky like it was incomplete. I actually hit refresh a few times thinking it would change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lameness pretty much all around.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 13:24:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bobby</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4549 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It is supposed to be CUIL</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-4330</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;It is supposed to be CUIL ... not CIUL. Either way, I still think the name stinks!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 15:45:41 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4330 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WOW what a name &quot;CIUL&quot;!!!
I</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-4324</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;WOW what a name &quot;CIUL&quot;!!!&lt;br /&gt;
I will bet that they did not check out the meaning of the word in Polish!!!!!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ciul&quot; title=&quot;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ciul&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=ciul&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Ciul is basically same word as &quot;chuj&quot;, but in different Polish dialect. (btw: Chuj means penis, dick in a rude way. Or a whore in some times)&lt;br /&gt;
Jaki ciul tam idzie! (Some dick is walking down here).&lt;br /&gt;
Adam to ciul bo wydymal moja Ewe! (Adam is a whore becouse he had sex with my girlfriend Eve) &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully someone knowing Polish can verify the description.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 13:38:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bob Madore</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 4324 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Cuil is definitely going for</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3887</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Cuil is definitely going for it, but it&#039;s hard to imagine them doing anything but incremental changes to what Google&#039;s done. And even that would take years of effort.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Me.dium.com has taken a different tack. We have a full web index, but we change the results based on the surfing activity of our user base (now over 2,000,000). It&#039;s in alpha, but I&#039;d be curious to hear your thoughts. &lt;a href=&quot;http://me.dium.com/search&quot; title=&quot;http://me.dium.com/search&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://me.dium.com/search&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 14:47:42 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3887 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I did a search of my name.</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3865</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I did a search of my name. It is linked to my website and there is a photo of an olympic sharp shooter next to the link to my website? WTF? Yes there is an olympic sharp shooter with my same name but how in the hell did it get associated to my business?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:48:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3865 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>funny thing is, I searched</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3847</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;funny thing is, I searched &quot;cuil sucks&quot; using cuil, not one result.  &quot;Cuil sucks&quot; in google yieds 1,980 results.  Type in &quot;Google sucks&quot; in Google and I get 144,000 results.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Very interesting...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 20:55:54 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>td</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3847 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>You&#039;d think that with $52M</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3846</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;You&#039;d think that with $52M you could afford to shell out a couple hundred thousand to acquire all the variants of the name. Creativity obviously isn&#039;t their forte. (Hey! Let&#039;s quit working for a cearch engine and start our own search engine!)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Oh well, my (KUEL.COM) traffic is through the roof, so all&#039;s well that ends well!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 19:59:14 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>KUEL.COM</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3846 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@ Mark,
No, they did not</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3771</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@ Mark,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, they did not just remove my images, as all the images for the sites in my niche have now been removed.  They&#039;re working on correcting the programming across their engine but the changes haven&#039;t trickled down and removed all the images as of yet (I&#039;m not defending them, just sharing information).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;@ John,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll be interested to see if you ever get your check.  And you&#039;ve given me a great strategy for protecting my copyright.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:25:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3771 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@ Catherine:
They are still</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3766</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@ Catherine:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are still infringing copyrights. Probably they took down just your images. I found about 20 or so images from my site, promoting competing sites in Cuil. Not cool.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A takedown request goes out today.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:51:56 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3766 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I took the issue of image</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3761</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I took the issue of image copyright infringement right to the top - I emailed Tom Costello today after I failed to receive a timely response from Cuil support.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I checked Cuil tonight, all images from listings to which they were not originally sourced have been removed.  The only images shown are those that appear on the actual site listed (which is as it should be).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s something encouraging about Cuil - they do listen to feedback (especially when thousands of potential DMCA cases are on the horizon).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 02:31:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3761 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ah, Catherine, I see now. I</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3750</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ah, Catherine, I see now. I saw they were linked, but didn&#039;t realize the links didn&#039;t go back to the original site.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:52:29 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Cyndy Aleo-Carreira509894</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3750 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Try searching for pressed</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3744</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Try searching for pressed penny.  Google results put &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pressedpenny.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pressedpenny.com&lt;/a&gt; at the top of the list, while cuil posts their graphics and zero links to them.  Giving search results with other sites&#039; graphics is a pretty cut and dried violation of copyright law.  Most of their graphics don&#039;t match the search results sites.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:24:39 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Pressed Penny</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3744 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>trying to search for mt.</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3743</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;trying to search for mt. everest restaurant since monday without any results .. cuil ineed sucks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:46:58 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bolt</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3743 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Cyndy
You&#039;ve missed the</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comment-3742</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Cyndy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You&#039;ve missed the point.  It&#039;s not about images being indexed, but how they&#039;re being used.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yes, my images are indexed in every search engine, but they are credited and linked to my site and mine alone.  Many of my images appear in the first page of Google&#039;s search results, but right underneath the image is credited to my site.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s a huge difference that just slapping any image next to any listing without crediting the original source nor even linking to the site on which it appears.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No other search engine would dare to misuse images in that manner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope that clarifies the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:27:31 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Catherine</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3742 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Picture This: Kuil, ciul, or just &quot;cuil sucks&quot;?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Google &amp;quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/trends/hottrends&quot;&gt;Hot Trends&lt;/a&gt;&amp;quot; service is always a fun read, and a good way to see what memes are currently being buffeted about by news events, pop culture, and human curiosity. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Right now, the nuclear-powered hype machine promoting the launch of &lt;a href=&quot;http://cuil.com&quot;&gt;Cuil&lt;/a&gt; has helped place four related terms into the Hot Trends top ten -- cuil, cuil search, cuil stock and cuil.com. But the terms further down the page are also interesting. The 21 and 24 spots contain misspellings of the new search engine&#039;s name. Number 35 is &#039;cuil sucks&#039; -- an unsurprising meme, considering Cuil&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://jeffnolan.com/wp/2008/07/28/why-im-cool-to-cuil/&quot;&gt;poor results&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-cuil-com-0-google-27-300&quot;&gt;certain searches&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u158/072808_cuil_misspelled.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Kuil ciul and cui sucks&quot; align=&quot;middle&quot; height=&quot;358&quot; width=&quot;424&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br clear=&quot;all&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/carly-fiorina-selected-mccains-running-mate&quot;&gt;Carly Fiorina selected as McCain&#039;s running mate&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/google-makes-bid-digg&quot;&gt;Google makes bid for Digg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/predictions/google-invests-1-billion-facebook&quot;&gt;Google invests $1 billion in Facebook&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Picture This: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-cuil-com-0-google-27-300&quot;&gt;Picture This: Cuil.com 0, Google 27,300&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/28/picture-kuil-ciul-or-just-cuil-sucks#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6862">co:Cuil</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5450">Picture This</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 14:11:47 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ian Lamont</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110726 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
