<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Picture this: Guess where Google gets 98% of its revenue? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/15/picture-where-does-googles-revenue-come</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Picture this: Guess where Google gets 98% of its revenue?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Yes, all these businesses,</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/15/picture-where-does-googles-revenue-come#comment-5283</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yes, all these businesses, TV, newspapers, magazines, etc... they are propaganda companies.  Yes, Google is the ultimate propaganda company.  Why do we think they&#039;re anything else?  Because they told us that they would &quot;Do No Evil&quot;, and we heard it so many times it became a factoid.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:53:26 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>SW</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5283 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Isn&#039;t any business that</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/15/picture-where-does-googles-revenue-come#comment-5273</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Isn&#039;t any business that bases a majority of its revenue (if not all) a glorified advertising company?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Advertiser or Advertisee (if that is a word)  uses the medium of the advertising company, in this particular article, google.   Which more or less makes them a pretty big advertising company.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:02:06 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 5273 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>By that measure TV</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/15/picture-where-does-googles-revenue-come#comment-2965</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;By that measure TV companies, newspapers, and magazines are also just glorified advertising companies. Except they&#039;re not - and neither is google.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PS: What would be non-glorified (i.e. regular) advertising company?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:55:18 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2965 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Picture this: Guess where Google gets 98% of its revenue?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/15/picture-where-does-googles-revenue-come</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While working on &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/07/14/googles-android-dead-it-arrives&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; on Google&#039;s Android cell phone project, I wondered what percentage of Google&#039;s revenue comes from advertising. I thought it would be a huge percentage, but didn&#039;t realize just how huge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This should erase any doubt from your mind that Google is anything but a glorified advertising company.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This data, from Google&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://google.brand.edgar-online.com/displayfilinginfo.aspx?FilingID=5927479-851-251313&amp;amp;type=sect&amp;amp;TabIndex=2&amp;amp;companyid=633170&amp;amp;ppu=%252fdefault.aspx%253fsym%253dGOOG&quot;&gt;latest 10-Q filing&lt;/a&gt; (page 25), had an interesting note at the bottom: &amp;quot;&lt;span class=&quot;Apple-style-span&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic&quot;&gt;Revenues realized through the Google Print Ads Program, Google Audio Ads, Google TV Ads, Google Checkout, YouTube, Postini and DoubleClick were not material in any of the periods presented.&lt;/span&gt;&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Google has its fingers in a lot of pies, but not a lot to show for it outside of search and AdWords.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;center&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/sites/thestandard.com/files/u2482/googletotalrevenuepercentage.jpg&quot; height=&quot;365&quot; width=&quot;336&quot; /&gt; &lt;/center&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thestandard.com/predictions/google-invests-1-billion-facebook&quot;&gt;Google invests $1 billion in Facebook&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/google-makes-bid-digg&quot;&gt;Google makes bid for Digg&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/twitter-starts-serving-ads-stateside&quot;&gt;Twitter starts serving ads stateside&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/twitter-worth-75-million-150-million-how-about-none-above&quot;&gt;Is Twitter worth $75 million? $150 million? How about none of the above?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/29/just-200-000-active-twitter-users&quot;&gt;Just 200,000 active Twitter users?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/15/picture-where-does-googles-revenue-come#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/778">co:google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2514">The Industry Standard</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:11:48 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jordan Golson</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109717 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
