<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Can 10 humans take on Techmeme’s algorithms and the Digg crowd? Blogged.com thinks so - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/02/can-10-humans-take-techmeme-s-algorithms-and-digg-crowd-blogged-com-thinks-so</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Can 10 humans take on Techmeme’s algorithms and the Digg crowd? Blogged.com thinks so&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Can 10 humans take on Techmeme’s algorithms and the Digg crowd? Blogged.com thinks so</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/02/can-10-humans-take-techmeme-s-algorithms-and-digg-crowd-blogged-com-thinks-so</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/bloggedcom-about-us1.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/bloggedcom-about-us1.jpg&quot; class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-94542&quot; title=&quot;bloggedcom-about-us1&quot; height=&quot;59&quot; width=&quot;180&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;I remember the days when &lt;a href=&quot;http://techmeme.com&quot;&gt;Techmeme&lt;/a&gt; was full of great tidbits and blogs with clever writing, but it seems as if something switched. Now, in order to find the more niche content that matches my tastes, I have to mine through half a page of Microsoft/Yahoo drama and speculation about the iPhone 3G.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogged.com&quot;&gt;Blogged.com&lt;/a&gt; thinks it can change this and challenge Techmeme and its fellow aggregators. The difference rests on the ongoing and highly debated battle between man and machine: While Techmeme and sites like it rely on algorithms to select content; Blogged uses the human brain. Unlike the human-powered &lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com&quot;&gt;Digg&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://mixx.com&quot;&gt;Mixx&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://propeller.com&quot;&gt;Propeller&lt;/a&gt;, all of which feature content voted to the top by the wisdom of the crowds, Blogged’s content is all curated by hand. In this way, it somewhat resembles &lt;a href=&quot;http://alltop.com&quot;&gt;Alltop&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://topnetpix.com&quot;&gt;TopNetPix&lt;/a&gt;. If your goal is to consume consume masses of content or navigate a hectic interface, those two might do the trick. For those that would prefer something elegant, Blogged’s interface suggests that its designers put thought into the design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blogged has a staff of 10 editors who spend their days mining through a database of blogs to find individual posts to feature on the site’s main pages. While many of the usual suspects all make an appearance today, I’ve discovered quite a few quirky, entertaining tidbits that would probably never land on Techmeme or get very far on Digg (see Chip Chick’s review of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chipchick.com/2008/07/carry_go_briefcase_barbecue.html&quot;&gt;highly portable Barbecue&lt;/a&gt; or Akihabara’s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.akihabaranews.com/en/news_details.php?id=16234&quot;&gt;Lazy Geek’s Cushion&lt;/a&gt;, for example).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I found that the featured posts were well-written and worth a read, assuming I hadn’t read them or something similar already. It is with this latter fact that some of our most plugged-in readers will take issue: those that use &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/a&gt; and, increasingly, &lt;a href=&quot;http://friendfeed.com&quot;&gt;FriendFeed&lt;/a&gt; to discover quality content will get it much faster there than they would on Blogged. The same is true for those that rely on Techmeme: An algorithm will always outrun a bunch of editors to the breaking news and always amass relevant content faster and Techmeme’s page will always change more over the the course of a day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Digg’s new recommendation engine, which VentureBeat’s MG Siegler found to be “&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/2008/07/01/digg-recommendation-engine-early-test-good-to-quite-good/&quot;&gt;good to quite good&lt;/a&gt;,” will also pose a serious challenge to Blogged: It’s probable that a machine that automatically matches niche content to my interests will do a better job than a handful of humans, no matter how selective they are.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But active Tweeters, FriendFeeders and Diggers are not Blogged’s target audience, anyway: The founders say their goal is to highlight quality blogs for the mainstream, a population that will be more tolerant of a post that is a few days old as long as what shows up is good. How to get to the mainstream without getting through the tech elite first is a question the founders will have to answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Blogged is based in Souther California and is privately funded.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/blog-directory-blogs-on-blogged.jpg&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://venturebeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/blog-directory-blogs-on-blogged.jpg&quot; class=&quot;alignnone size-full wp-image-94543&quot; title=&quot;blog-directory-blogs-on-blogged&quot; height=&quot;492&quot; width=&quot;590&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;More news, commentary, and predictions from &lt;i&gt;The Industry Standard&lt;/i&gt;:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/twitter-starts-serving-ads-stateside&quot;&gt;Twitter starts serving ads stateside&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/real-problem-googles-blogger-service-neglect&quot;&gt;The real problem with Google&#039;s Blogger service: Neglect&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/04/25/twitter-worth-75-million-150-million-how-about-none-above&quot;&gt;Is Twitter worth $75 million? $150 million? How about none of the above?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/07/02/can-10-humans-take-techmeme-s-algorithms-and-digg-crowd-blogged-com-thinks-so#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6119">co:blogged</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5840">co:techmeme</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/6118">co:wordpress</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/98">Breaking News</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 16:10:08 -0400</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Venture Beat</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">109047 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
