<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>@David - Thanks! It&#039;s been a</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8397</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@David - Thanks! It&#039;s been a long time coming.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 06:38:51 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8397 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Daniel, my bad and congrats</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8392</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Daniel, my bad and congrats for breaking the $5M mark!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 16:12:50 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8392 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@David - I did indeed mean</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8388</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@David - I did indeed mean less gray in a towards 100% direction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 15:35:44 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8388 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@David, I think you and</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8385</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;@David, I think you and Daniel are saying the same thing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Based on the interesting report revealing the way the U.S. government is considering Google a near-monopoly now, this looks like a done deal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Judged at 100%.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 11:00:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8385 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>@Daniel, I am a little</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8381</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;@Daniel, I am a little confused by your comments (which suggests a 0% judgment on a technicality). You have a FOR bet and would stand to make sizable gains with a 100% judgment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, my opinion is that it is clear that federal government threat to file a suit is a sign of non-approval regardless of whether Google/Yahoo abandons the deal prior. As such, a 100% judgment should be rendered for this prediction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 10:01:05 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8381 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Less gray:</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8380</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Less gray: &lt;a href=&quot;http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/12/hogans-litvack.html&quot; title=&quot;http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/12/hogans-litvack.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/12/hogans-litvack.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They called it off three hours before officially &quot;failing regulatory muster&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:59:56 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8380 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I don&#039;t think anything else</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-8032</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;I don&#039;t think anything else is coming on this.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 06:43:34 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8032 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A little more...&quot;To Yahoo&#039;s</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7684</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;A little more...&quot;To Yahoo&#039;s dismay, Google backed off to avoid a challenge from the U.S. Justice Department, &lt;b&gt;which said it would sue&lt;/b&gt; to block the Yahoo deal to preserve competition in Internet advertising.&quot;  Could be viewed as a &quot;failed to meet regulatory muster&quot;.  Definitely leaning more towards a 100% judgment.  Unfortunate gray area.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 14:17:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7684 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>That is why I asked early on</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7678</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;That is why I asked early on how this prediction is to be handled if deal is abandoned. No response was received to address that.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:21:39 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7678 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>While the deal wasn&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7677</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;While the deal wasn&#039;t &quot;thrown out&quot;, it&#039;s certainly not going to pass regulatory muster (&quot;This prediction will be judged after Yahoo and Google officially receive the blessing of the U.S. federal government.&quot;) - which I assume would be the requirement for success. Also, I think we can assume Google feels any acceptable deal to them would in fact be &quot;thrown out&quot; or else they wouldn&#039;t have walked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&#039;d say it&#039;s definitely not a 0%, it&#039;s arguably a 100%, and it&#039;s certainly a gray area.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:47:01 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Daniel Fort</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7677 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This is kind of a tricky</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7673</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is kind of a tricky one, guys.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you read today&#039;s reports, they say, &quot;The U.S. Department of Justice was &lt;b&gt;planning to block&lt;/b&gt; Google&#039;s proposed advertising deal with Yahoo, leading to Google&#039;s announcement Wednesday that it was backing out, according to Yahoo.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my mind, that would render a favorable judgment towards, &quot;Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster?&quot;  However, I could see an argument made that due to the way Bradley stated, &quot;This is a prediction that the partnership deal will be thrown out by the DoJ and/or FTC,&quot; - which didn&#039;t specifically happen - some could ask for a 0% judgment.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m leaning towards favorable judgment due to the news reports today, but am curious about your opinions. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 10:06:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7673 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Well.. this one can now be</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7668</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Well.. this one can now be judged. Google has just announced decision to abandon the deal with Yahoo&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:30:11 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7668 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Looks like those with active</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7615</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Looks like those with active bet on this one will have to wait a tad longer as Yahoo/Google revise deal plan and resubmit to DOJ.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A26OW20081103?feedType=RSS&amp;amp;feedName=technologyNews&amp;amp;rpc=22&amp;amp;sp=true&quot; title=&quot;http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A26OW20081103?feedType=RSS&amp;amp;feedName=technologyNews&amp;amp;rpc=22&amp;amp;sp=true&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSTRE4A26OW20081103?feed...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:13:26 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7615 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Indeed, as the WSJ reports,</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7543</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;Indeed, as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122540817013886075.html?mod=djemalertTECH&quot;&gt;WSJ reports&lt;/a&gt;, this could be judged/determined next week.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:00:46 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7543 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.washingtonpost.com</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comment-7536</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR2008103100009.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR2008103100009.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/31/AR200810...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 05:14:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>David Kuan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7536 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo!/Google ad deal fails regulatory muster?</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Judgment on Dec. 4, 2008:&lt;/b&gt;  In a rare moment, the community actually got this one wrong.  Based on recent news reports, it has been revealed that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/amlawdaily/2008/12/hogans-litvack.html&quot;&gt;deal was scrapped&lt;/a&gt;, &amp;quot;...just three hours before the Department of Justice planned to file antitrust charges to block the pact, according to the lawyer who would have been lead counsel for the government.&amp;quot;  Judged at 100%, for having &amp;quot;faiied regulatory muster&amp;quot; per the prediction&#039;s intent.  -- The Industry Standard &lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Original prediction:&lt;/b&gt; Various groups, including most notably Microsoft, are likely to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;taxonomyName=internet_business&amp;amp;articleId=9097998&amp;amp;taxonomyId=71&amp;amp;intsrc=kc_top&quot;&gt;express concerns&lt;/a&gt; to the Department of Justice about the &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/12/google-yahoo-strike-ad-deal-0&quot;&gt;recently-announced&lt;/a&gt; advertising partnership between Yahoo! and Google.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those companies have publicly stated that they don&#039;t believe regulatory approval is necessary, but that in a show of good faith they intend to seek it prior to the commencement of activities under the deal.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a prediction that the partnership deal will be thrown out by the DoJ and/or FTC.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There has been some recent movement in this story &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/06/19/house-leaders-plan-hearing-google-yahoo-deal&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  This prediction will be judged after Yahoo and Google officially receive the blessing of the U.S. federal government. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-google-ad-deal-fails-regulatory-muster#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/787">Google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1531">Internet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/790">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5667">Software &amp;amp; Web</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/750">Yahoo!</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:17:26 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108631 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
