<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Yahoo! misses Q1 earnings, Microsoft drops bid, then swoops back in - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Yahoo! misses Q1 earnings, Microsoft drops bid, then swoops back in&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Man, Tom, you should post</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back#comment-628</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Man, Tom, you should post that idea as a Suggestion!  Really interesting idea.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 13:29:21 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill113600</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 628 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>While this scenario is</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back#comment-609</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;While this scenario is possible, any activity that would drive the price down will attract other potential buyers - say, Apple, for instance.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That combination would be a rather startling addition to the evolving/future user application market.  MS has spent large sums of money on server class products and a failed desktop OS rollout (probably the last in the company history).  They want to get into the fight with Google and can&#039;t get out of their own way to make a play in the SaaS model world.  They can&#039;t even come close to catching up with Google unless they leverage all of their horsepower to build a Google-like delivery capability. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple could buy their way into that game and shoot past MS.  They would immediately have a 2nd place slot behind Google and block MS from quickly getting into that game (translation = MS will have to spend time and money after changing their corporate culture to properly deliver a SaaS user experience).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apple can leverage the Yahoo engines, the Zimbra (open source) mail engine, and their own BSD based desktop operating system to create a seamless user experience (interface and guts).  I would bet many of the Yahoo shareholders would take any offer from Apple over a MS low-ball offer any day of the week.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:43:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Tom C</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 609 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>God Bless Competition!
And</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back#comment-608</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;God Bless Competition!&lt;br /&gt;
And bless also the corporate dominance of companies that not just can... BUT DO ! ! !&lt;br /&gt;
Say what anyone will about MS. They are the gorilla and they have eanred it.&lt;br /&gt;
MS made a remarkably FAIR bid for Yahoo (which has now become more synomous with the NOUN than the exclamatory!) and their provincial, non-shareholder value positioning, will/has squash/ed the value down to $25 a share. What a corporate mass of boobs! And they truly abandoned their fiduciary role on behalf of shareholders and health of the corporation. It may be that Yahoo will recover and someday become a heavy-weight once again, but business and competition DON&#039;T WORK THAT-A-WAY! It&#039;s always about cost of capital... and if there is a management team with a competitive vision that is willing to PAY for something for a flailing company, then the MARKET SAYS, go for it. Do IT!&lt;br /&gt;
I hope MS washes Yahoo&#039;s collective boards&#039; faces in it when they finally take over the company at perhaps an even more greatly reduced value point than $25.&lt;br /&gt;
Lou - Lighthouse/Watersone Consulting&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 14:42:48 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Louis Anasinis</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 608 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft takes a dump on</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back#comment-607</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Microsoft takes a dump on the Internet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I think this is a match made in hell.  The cultures are oil and water and Microsoft just doesn&#039;t get how the web works.  In my mind what they are really doing is wrecking a decent internet company, devaluing their own company and leaving a big stinking pile of pooh on the internet where yahoo used to be.  Maybe someday they&#039;ll come around to, &quot;If you can&#039;t beat them join them.&quot;  Right now it&#039;s the same old style of thinking.  Beat them, beat them again and then beat them until they&#039;re dead.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:55:06 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>deb walkup</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 607 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yahoo! misses Q1 earnings, Microsoft drops bid, then swoops back in</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;background-color: #dddddd; font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;Looks like the community was right -- today Yahoo! beat expectations. Total revenue for the quarter was $1.8 billion, net revenues were $1.35 billion. Net Income was $542 million, or $0.37 per share. Therefore, the first condition of this prediction has not been met. --The Industry Standard&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Henry Blodget, via Kara Swisher, lays out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/3/yahoo_disaster_scenario_blowing_q1&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the following possible scenario&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;“Microsoft goes about its business until early April--nominating its slate of board members, preparing for a hostile shareholder meeting--and then, just after Yahoo reports a horrendous first quarter, pulls its offer for the company. Yahoo&#039;s stock collapses, costing shareholders 40% overnight. Jerry &amp;amp; &lt;st1:place w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;Co.&lt;/st1:place&gt; are pummeled with shareholder complaints and lawsuits, and Yahoo&#039;s employee and shareholder morale hit all-time low. Then, just when all hope seems lost, Microsoft comes charging back and saves the day with a $25 bid, and Yahoo owners flatten Jerry &amp;amp; Co. in a stampede to tender their shares.”&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;This is a prediction that must meet three conditions in order to be judged favorably:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;        &lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;First, Yahoo misses its Q1 earnings estimates.                                                                   &lt;br /&gt;Second, MSFT withdraws its current bid for Yahoo!                                                                 &lt;br /&gt;Third, MSFT brings forth a new bid in the $23-27 range.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;o:p&gt;&lt;/o:p&gt;These conditions do NOT require that Yahoo! actually accept the new bid (although in that case it would seem likely). Above Blodget says that MSFT will “save the day” – but again, the success or lack thereof of the new bid is outside of the scope of this prediction.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/yahoo-misses-q1-earnings-microsoft-drops-bid-then-swoops-back#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5661">Business &amp;amp; Finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/790">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2571">Q1</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/750">Yahoo!</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:02:32 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">102958 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
