<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Top four reasons Blu-ray Disc will tank - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/27/top-four-reasons-blu-ray-disc-will-tank</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Top four reasons Blu-ray Disc will tank&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Top four reasons Blu-ray Disc will tank</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/27/top-four-reasons-blu-ray-disc-will-tank</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p&gt;And then there was one: Blu-ray.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The battle between the next-generation,  high-definition optical disc formats was an exciting, if exasperating, contest  to follow. But now that the smoke is clearing, and Blu-ray has officially kicked  HD DVD&#039;s proverbial butt, why am I still waiting to buy a Blu-ray player? I  mean, my colleague spent US$1,000 dollars a year ago so that he could be the  first one his the block to own one, and today, Blu-ray players are less than  half that price.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why doesn&#039;t my local Blockbuster carry Blu-ray Disc  movies? In fact, why are my trips to Blockbuster so infrequent these  days?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m thinking that Blu-ray -- and high-definition optical disc  ownership in general -- just isn&#039;t that appealing. I&#039;ve watched Blu-ray movies  on the best televisions money can buy in Circuit City, Best Buy and Tweeter, and  while the picture looks terrific, it just doesn&#039;t have me reaching for my wallet  the way DVDs did when they were first introduced. Maybe it&#039;s because it&#039;s an  evolutionary improvement in video quality and not the revolutionary jump that  occurred when DVDs overtook VHS tapes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So I&#039;ve come up with these four  reasons why I -- and probably most of America -- won&#039;t be heading down to  Wal-Mart to buy a Blu-ray player anytime soon:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. Blu-ray players are  more than four times the cost of standard DVD players. In fact, Sony just  announced Wednesday that it will be releasing its next-generation player for a  cool $400 this summer. Still too much. Experts say the magic number that will  spur real consumer adoption of optical disc technology is $199. Some analysts  predict we may see Blu-ray players for $199 by the holiday season, but I&#039;m not  holding my breath.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve had a certain disdain for Blu-ray Disc from the  beginning (even though I figured it would win the format war) because of the  high price of the players. I know this is partly due to the fact that, unlike HD  DVD, manufacturers had to change out their DVD platter-pressing equipment for  the new format. But I can&#039;t help but consider that Sony and others may be  keeping the prices artificially high because they knew from the beginning they  had a leg up on HD DVD when it came to studio support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. Upgraded DVD  players offer near-HD quality for a fraction of the price. Have you been in your  local Best Buy, Sears or Circuit City lately? That&#039;s right, 480i, 480p, 720p,  1080i, 1080p output are all offered on these inexpensive players, and you can  purchase upgraded DVD burners as well for about half the cost of a Blu-ray  player.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to industry analysts, the sweet spot for  high-definition televisions is from 32-in. to 46-in. screens. If you&#039;re sitting  eight or more feet away from one of those televisions, I don&#039;t believe you&#039;re  going to notice enough of a difference to convince you to spend a couple hundred  more dollars on a Blu-ray player.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. Why buy when you can rent? There was  a time when I loved being able to grab a VHS tape or DVD out of my collection to  watch a movie over and over again, because going out to the video store was a  pain and got expensive over time. But that was before video-on-demand. Now, all  I have to do if I want to watch my favorite movie once or twice a year is pay  $1.99, and I don&#039;t have to store to stupid thing. Sure, I still have a few dozen  of my very favorite DVDs (The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, Blade Runner,  Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, The Lord of the Rings), but it&#039;s not like I&#039;ve  built up a library akin to the 200-plus VHS tapes I once owned. It&#039;s just not as  appealing anymore. Even my colleague with the Blu-ray player says he doesn&#039;t buy  movies. In a year, he&#039;s bought just six.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These days, I prefer the  video-on-demand services I get off my set-top cable box. They&#039;re cheap and easy  to use. According to Michael Cai, director of broadband and gaming issues at  media research firm Park Associates in Dallas, Internet movie downloads and  video-on-demand rentals will represent a $1 billion market in two years. If you  include advertising dollars, it will represent a $7 billion market in  2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also coming down the pike is the ability to buy movies from your  cable provider and store them either on your set-top DVR box or store them with  your cable provider just like any online storage service offers free capacity  today, according to Cai.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Cable service providers with video-on-demand  services are a strong contender to Internet video downloads,&amp;quot; he says. &amp;quot;If you  can fairly easily rent or buy a movie through a cable box, you&#039;d probably rather  do that than ordering a movie through an Internet site.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Downloads.  While currently not up to speed, hardware like the Xbox 360 allows you to  download movies in the background while playing games, so you won&#039;t pull your  hair out as they trickle in overnight. But over time, cable provider bandwidth  will increase -- and so will Internet downloads. My current fiber optic cable  service offers 30Mbit./sec. downloads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obviously, I prefer my big  television screen to an iPod or PC monitor, but I think the ability to transfer  those downloads to a DVR box, Apple TV or some other hard drive will advance  quickly. And, don&#039;t think Blu-ray champion Sony doesn&#039;t know that. According to  a recent Wall Street Journal article, Sony CEO Howard Stringer is getting ready  to challenge Apple in video-downloading services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Though he doesn&#039;t have  proof, Cai suspects that movie studios may be working at artificially slowing  the advancement of movie downloads in order to maintain control of content. They  learned a lesson from the music download industry after watching Apple dominate  that market. Also, there&#039;s more of a profit margin in retail sales of Blu-ray  Disc players and movies. For that reason alone, I&#039;m more partial to supporting  downloads once they&#039;re a viable option.
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related news, commentary, and predictions:&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Prediction: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/101650&quot;&gt;Microsoft will announce Xbox/Blu-ray integration plans this month&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Analysis: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/02/12/home-server-your-pocket&quot;&gt;The home server in your pocket&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;News: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/02/19/microsoft-stays-mum-blu-ray-disc-support&quot;&gt;Microsoft stays mum on Blu-ray Disc support&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;News: &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/02/16/report-toshiba-halts-hd-dvd-production-mulling-future&quot;&gt;Toshiba halts HD DVD production, mulling future&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Note:&lt;/b&gt; Anonymous comments on The Industry Standard are disabled. To leave a comment and participate in the Standard&#039;s prediction market, please &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/user/register?destination=search/predictions&quot;&gt;register&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; first.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/news/2008/02/27/top-four-reasons-blu-ray-disc-will-tank#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2245">Blu-ray</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5662">Hardware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2766">HD-DVD</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1868">HDTV</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1792">Sony</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/1475">Storage</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/99">Views &amp;amp; Analysis</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:02:24 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>IDG News Service</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">102099 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
