<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.thestandard.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The Industry Standard - Microsoft’s OOXML standard will not be granted standard status following the ISO ballot resolution - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Microsoft’s OOXML standard will not be granted standard status following the ISO ballot resolution&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>What a hit.</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comment-775</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;What a hit.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:54:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 775 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Yup.   Looks to be a done</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comment-742</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Yup.   Looks to be a done deal.  I have to say, this one really took me by surprise (and apparently a lot of other people, too).   One of our first big community missteps.  We&#039;ll award this tomorrow, at what looks to be S$0, unless this is some sort of unbelievably intricate April Fool&#039;s joke.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 11:22:36 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 742 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>http://www.pcworld.com/articl</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comment-739</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,144009-c,establishedtechnologystandards/article.html&quot; title=&quot;http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,144009-c,establishedtechnologystandards/article.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,144009-c,establishedtechnologystandard...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Accepted.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 08:06:44 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Bradley Baker</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 739 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>/. claims (via Cnet, et al)</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comment-721</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;/. claims (via Cnet, et al) that OOXML &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.slashdot.org/tech/08/03/31/0039238.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;will PASS&lt;/a&gt;, regardless of massive irregularities in the voting.  Sounds like some WWF action is going on, if you know what I mean.   Yikes!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 20:12:00 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 721 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Patrick Durusau, the editor</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comment-688</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;Patrick Durusau, the editor of the Open Document Format standard, has &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/03/25/odf-editor-odf-loses-if-ooxml-does&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;written a letter&lt;/a&gt; that supports OOXML being made a standard by the ISO. He says that nothing will be gained if the ISO shoots down OOXML, and points to specific Microsoft-related limitations of the ODF standard, such as those associated with Excel.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:12:07 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 688 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>It appears that the final</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comment-529</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;It appears that the final decision on this should be out by March 29th. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 13:44:01 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Eric Hill812251</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 529 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Microsoft’s OOXML standard will not be granted standard status following the ISO ballot resolution</title>
 <link>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso</link>
 <description>&lt;!--paging_filter--&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;background-color: #dddddd; font-weight: bold&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;This is one of a very few times that the community &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1123&quot;&gt;has been wrong&lt;/a&gt;.  --The Industry Standard&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Microsoft&#039;s much-ballyhooed move to let &lt;a href=&quot;/news/2008/02/21/open-apis-may-help-microsoft-repair-reputation&quot;&gt;developers build open-source implementations on the APIs of some of its most valuable intellectual property and embrace industry standards&lt;/a&gt; may seem remarkable. Nevertheless, it won’t help Microsoft’s efforts relating to the Office Open XML (OOXML) ballot resolution at the meeting of the International Standards Organization, which takes place in &lt;st1:city w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;Geneva&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt; from February 25-29, 2008. Microsoft &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=1207&quot;&gt;desperately wants the ISO to award its document format ISO standards status&lt;/a&gt;. However, Microsoft&#039;s history of bullying and missteps -- including an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/08/31/Sweden-OOXML-vote-invalid_1.html&quot;&gt;attempt to bribe participants in an earlier OOXML ISO vote&lt;/a&gt; -- have poisoned the waters. When the results of the &lt;st1:city w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;&lt;st1:place w:st=&quot;on&quot;&gt;Geneva&lt;/st1:place&gt;&lt;/st1:city&gt; meeting are announced, Microsoft will come up short -- OOXML will not be granted ISO standard status by the ballot resolution. Betting will close on the date listed with this prediction, but &lt;i&gt;The Standard &lt;/i&gt;will not make a judgment until an official announcement by the ISO. &lt;span&gt; &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.thestandard.com/predictions/microsoft-s-ooxml-standard-will-not-be-granted-standard-status-following-iso-ballot-reso#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2885">ISO</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/790">Microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/2884">OOXML</category>
 <category domain="http://www.thestandard.com/taxonomy/term/5668">Standards &amp;amp; Legal</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:05:50 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">101767 at http://www.thestandard.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
