In the US we often take a knee-jerk approach to notifying people about data security incidents. Our enterprises therefore issue a bunch of confusing and unnecessary data security breach notices. It is hard for US consumers to tell the difference between an important notification and a meaningless one. Australia's draft voluntary guidelines therefore deserve praise. They are more intelligent than the typical US approach. They advise a dataholder to evaluate the true impact of a putative data security breach as part of the decision whether to send a notice and what to say in the notice if it is sent. --Ben


Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
Respectful debate is welcome, but comments that are defamatory, indecent, abusive, or in violation of any law will be removed.